Re: Proposal: ExplicitForall

2009-07-24 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Brobergniklas.brob...@gmail.com wrote: Alright, let's set an actual discussion period of 2 weeks for ExplicitForall. If there is no opposition by then, we can add ExplicitForall to the registered extensions in cabal as a first step. Slightly more than

what about moving the record system to an addendum?

2009-07-06 Thread Samuel Bronson
According to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Status, ticket #99 was rejected, but the tickets own page, http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/ticket/99, says probably yes. Which is it? I was about to propose this myself, but decided to check the trac just in case it had