On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Folks
Which of these definitions are correct Haskell?
x1 = 4 + -5
x2 = -4 + 5
x3 = 4 - -5
x4 = -4 - 5
x5 = 4 * -5
x6 = -4 * 5
Ghc accepts x2, x4, x6 and rejects the others with a message like
Foo.hs:4:7:
Precedence parsing error
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Montag, 30. Januar 2006 19:33 schrieb Isaac Jones:
[...]
Have you looked at the Helium language / compiler? It's a
stripped-down version of Haskell for teaching. Maybe that's what
you're actually suggesting? I think this is a great
On Jan 25, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Dear all, in the "mission statement" I read
We will strive to only include tried-and-true language features,
but the current discussion seems to have a wider focus,
i. e. it is more of a wish list. Indeed I think that this is a good
id
