Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-27 Thread Josef Svenningsson
FYI, Cayenne used the center dot as composition. See the System$HO module. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~augustss/cayenne/system.html I remember liking it but I think the ring operator would be closer to mathematics notation and indeed the best choice. Cheers, /Josef On 3/25/06, Dylan Thurston <[EM

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-27 Thread Doaitse Swierstra
I am not sure how this look in other people's editors and mail- readers, but on my machine (Mac OS X Tiger) there is significantly more white space after the symbol than before. Is that normal? For emacs, just bind a key (C-. say) to (ucs-insert #X2218). ucs-insert comes from ucs-tables.

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-26 Thread Nils Anders Danielsson
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Jon Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For emacs, just bind a key (C-. say) to (ucs-insert > #X2218). ucs-insert comes from ucs-tables. You can also activate the TeX input method using C-u C-\ TeX RET (if leim is installed). Then you can insert many characters by typing

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-25 Thread Jared Updike
> For emacs, just bind a key (C-. say) to (ucs-insert > #X2218). ucs-insert comes from ucs-tables. Sounds easy enough. I'll test emacs and my terminal and see about it. > > 2) Will it show up in PuTTY (and everyone else's terminals/IDEs)? > > Eventually. > > > in everyone's mail readers (includi

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-25 Thread Jon Fairbairn
Gah! I managed to send that without a content-type field (for bizarre reasons which I won't elaborate right now). Here it is again with what I hope is the right (utf-8) type, which ought to make it more legible in some email readers. On 2006-03-25 at 09:41PST "Jared Updike" wrote: > > 2218 R

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-25 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2006-03-25 at 09:41PST "Jared Updike" wrote: > > 2218 RING OPERATOR > > = composite function > > = APL jot > > 00B0 degree sign > > 25E6 white bullet > > > > I don't think any other Unicode character should be considered. > > That's great but > 1

Re: Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-25 Thread Jared Updike
> 2218 RING OPERATOR > = composite function > = APL jot > 00B0 degree sign > 25E6 white bullet > > I don't think any other Unicode character should be considered. That's great but 1) I have no idea how to type it. Can I easily and comfortably? In em

Alternatives to . for composition

2006-03-25 Thread Dylan Thurston
At http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/CompositionAsDot , there is a list of possible Unicode replacements for the '.' operator. Oddly, the canonical one is missing (from http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2200.pdf ): 2218 RING OPERATOR = composite function