The committee was formed from a pool of suggestions supplied to SPJ that
represented a fairly wide cross-section of the community.
Simon initially offered both myself and Johan Tibell the role of co-chairs.
Johan ultimately declined.
In the end, putting perhaps too simple a spin on it, the
Thanks for the background, Edward.
I don't mean to question the composition of the committee, only to start
a discussion about how the community might handle the selection process
going forward. I apologize if I was not clear about that. As I said
below, if a direct vote resulted in the same
Apologies for the previous mailer-mangled "draft"...
On 10/21/2015 07:55 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2015-10-21 at 02:39:57 +0200, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> In effect, only those who actively follow the libraries list have had a
>> voice in these decisions.
On 10/21/2015 07:55 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Hello, > > On 2015-10-21 at 02:39:57 +0200, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: > > [...]
> >> In effect, only those who actively follow the libraries list have
had a >> voice in these decisions. Maybe that is what the community
wants. I hope >> not.
Hello,
On 2015-10-21 at 02:39:57 +0200, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
[...]
> In effect, only those who actively follow the libraries list have had a
> voice in these decisions. Maybe that is what the community wants. I hope
> not. How then can people like me (and Henrik and Graham) have a say
>
