Re: Defaults for superclass methods

2006-04-13 Thread Dave Menendez
John Meacham writes: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:35:09AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: On 11 April 2006 11:08, Ross Paterson wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:03:22AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: This is a rather useful extension, and as far as I can tell it doesn't have a ticket yet:

Defaults for superclass methods

2006-04-11 Thread Simon Marlow
This is a rather useful extension, and as far as I can tell it doesn't have a ticket yet: http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-March/003494.html should I create a ticket? Is there any reason it might be hard to implement? Cheers, Simon

Re: Defaults for superclass methods

2006-04-11 Thread Ross Paterson
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:03:22AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: This is a rather useful extension, and as far as I can tell it doesn't have a ticket yet: http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-March/003494.html should I create a ticket? Is there any reason it might be hard to

RE: Defaults for superclass methods

2006-04-11 Thread Simon Marlow
On 11 April 2006 11:08, Ross Paterson wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:03:22AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: This is a rather useful extension, and as far as I can tell it doesn't have a ticket yet: http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-March/003494.html should I create a