In the section "Changes to the Report" of the Wiki page you refer to
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/BangPatterns
I attempted to give the semantics of bang-patterns by saying what changes would
be needed in the Haskell Report. If you think it's incomplete or ambiguous,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:20:45PM -0700, Dave Bayer wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>
>> You could have just used -ddump-ds... Core is way more readable than
>> GHC assembly.
>
> Great suggestion!
>
> Core looks familiar from playing with template Haskell, is it identica
On Jul 6, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
You could have just used -ddump-ds... Core is way more readable than
GHC assembly.
Great suggestion!
Core looks familiar from playing with template Haskell, is it identical?
Can one / does anyone use Core as a target for experimental toy
la
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:01PM -0700, Dan Weston wrote:
> From Haskell' ticket #76:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/BangPatterns
>
> > The main idea is to add a single new production to the syntax
> > of patterns
> > pat ::= !pat
>
> Experiments (ghci -fbang-patterns -O
