Claus Reinke writes:
> may I be so optimistic as to interpret the absolute lack of counter
> arguments over the last week as indication that this proposal is
> acceptable in general?
Since we don't have any experience of using this extension, and it comes late
in the day, it's highly unlikely to
name:
introduce lambda-match (explicit match failure and fall-through)
Dear All,
may I be so optimistic as to interpret the absolute lack of counter
arguments over the last week as indication that this proposal is
acceptable in general? Thanks to those few who have expressed
support so far,
