Hi, I'd like to propose an extremely simple extension to ghc's record
disambiguation rules,
my motivation is that I often have record types with multiple constructors
but common fields.
so the handy idiom of
f Rec { .. } = do
blah
return Rec { .. }
won't work,
> Hi, I'd like to propose an extremely simple extension to
> ghc's record disambiguation rules,
>
John, I've just posted a proposal on the 'Records in
Haskell' wiki that I think will do the job for you.
"Declared Overloaded Record Fields" (DORF). I
