On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:47:39PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Aaron J. Grier [2005-10-24 16:45]:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:36:16PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Variable width character sets are themselves hateful.
> > but they're easier than fixed-width charsets to read.
> Aren???t
* Aaron J. Grier [2005-10-25 00:15]:
> I thought "iso-8859-1//TRANSLIT" was the reccomended setting
> for $charset you stated on the list?
For those who want to stick to an 8-bit encoding for their
terminal.
$charset configures the terminal's encoding. If you're using a
UTF-8 terminal then $char
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:53:58PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> the byte encoding of the character was preserved correctly in your
> reply, but its headers claim a charset of `iso-8859-1//TRANSLIT` so it
> comes out mangled on my end. Your mutt is not configured correctly.
> Make sure your mutt's $
