Aaron J. Grier wrote:
it raises the question, but doesn't beg it. http://begthequestion.info/
I know this is a little bit off topic and a little late (as I have some
time and am reading threads that I've left unread for a while). But,
who is so bitter about the incorrect use of 'begs the
On 20 Oct 2006, at 18:27, Jeremy Stephens wrote:
Aaron J. Grier wrote:
it raises the question, but doesn't beg it. http://
begthequestion.info/
I know this is a little bit off topic and a little late (as I have
some
time and am reading threads that I've left unread for a while). But,
* Martin Ebourne li...@ebourne.me.uk [2006-10-19 22:10]:
Of course, that would require it to maintain a list of always
blocked addresses in addition to the list of always allowed,
quite a bit of extra code complexity. Or bugs.
And then there's all the extra UI complexity of letting people
What's hateful is that there's no easy way to override this from
the UI -- sometimes, whatever the script writer's opinion, *I*
want the UI elements, and I want a button somewhere obvious on
such windows that gives me back all of the browser chrome, no
questions asked.
So you want the ability
* jrod...@hate.spamportal.net jrod...@hate.spamportal.net [2006-10-20 00:35]:
So you want the ability open up a new window without the
familiar interface, that has an intuitive element to return the
interface.
Precisely.
I think our ideas of intuitve and obvious diverged somewhere in
the
On Oct 19, 2006, at 23:31, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* jrod...@hate.spamportal.net jrod...@hate.spamportal.net
[2006-10-19 22:15]:
Create new window. Stupid, but I can see the rationale. Create
new window without the normal url bar? Whaat? Without _Menus_?
Without *scrollbars*, regardless of
