On 1/23/07, seph wrote:
Simon Wistow writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:19:11PM -0500, seph said:
>> While all software is hateful, the windows's "close window" button on
>> the title bar works fine. If your window manager hides that, then it's
>> truely hateful.
>
> Weirdly enough that was
Simon Wistow writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:19:11PM -0500, seph said:
>> While all software is hateful, the windows's "close window" button on
>> the title bar works fine. If your window manager hides that, then it's
>> truely hateful.
>
> Weirdly enough that was my first port of call - it'
On 1/23/07, Simon Wistow wrote:
This is especially irritating when I've still got my connections open to
other machines on the same LAN or the Xen instance I'm running on my
machine because my shortcut of firing up the Task Manager and hitting
kill process is nigh on impossible because the proce
You can sometimes 'restart session' from a dead putty.
But oddly sometimes not. (yes i'm using virtual dimensions too, also hateful)
--
osfameron
On 23/01/07, Simon Wistow wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:19:11PM -0500, seph said:
> While all software is hateful, the windows's "close window"
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:19:11PM -0500, seph said:
> While all software is hateful, the windows's "close window" button on
> the title bar works fine. If your window manager hides that, then it's
> truely hateful.
Weirdly enough that was my first port of call - it's not hidden it's
just greyed
Simon Wistow writes:
> The only way you can close a Putty session is by exiting the shell or by
> killing the process in the Task Manager.
While all software is hateful, the windows's "close window" button on
the title bar works fine. If your window manager hides that, then it's
truely hateful.
Given that PuTTY is generally pretty damn nifty I'm willing to possibly
lay the blame on something else (for example, XP itself. Or a a peice of
Virtual Desktop software I'm running called Virtual Dimension) hwoever
the hate still stands with ... with SOMETHING DAMMIT.
And it smells like this.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:44:06PM +, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
>
> I had a problem with the list view in Nautilus when I first installed Ubuntu
> on a machine: all fields were unselected, so it showed nothing.
>
> I am told this was never supposed to happen, but it did. I guess the
> restric
I had a problem with the list view in Nautilus when I first installed Ubuntu
on a machine: all fields were unselected, so it showed nothing.
I am told this was never supposed to happen, but it did. I guess the
restriction was made at the UI level, but it (or at least the version I was
using) nev
So I get called to this user's desk at a new company I'm doing some
work for. It seems that for the last two weeks, he's been firing up
his Evolution and wondering why no email is visible, even though when
he goes to OWA he can see and manipulate his email (as normally as
you can when using Firefo
10 matches
Mail list logo