On 13-Sep-2007, at 07:33, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
As it turned out to be, the CVS/Root file here had wrong permissions.
Don't ask me why. Anyway, I had to use strace to find out -- you think
cvs would complain ? n.
OK, that bloody well qualifies as legitimate CVS hate. Good followup.
On 13/09/2007, Peter da Silva wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:32, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> > You never get tired of hating CVS.
>
> I don't know what you broke, but you had to have broken something to
> get that result.
>
> What did you actually break, and is it CVS fault? You may be hating th
On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:32, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
You never get tired of hating CVS.
I don't know what you broke, but you had to have broken something to
get that result.
What did you actually break, and is it CVS fault? You may be hating the
wrong thing. The real hate may be tastier.
On 9/13/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> $ cvs up
> cvs update: move away Foo/Bar.pm; it is in the way
> C Foo/Bar.pm
Is this a CVS hate, a case-insensitive filesystem hate, or both for
the price of one?
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton
You never get tired of hating CVS.
$ cvs up
cvs update: move away Foo/Bar.pm; it is in the way
C Foo/Bar.pm
okay.
$ rm Foo/Bar.pm
$ cvs up
U Foo/Bar.pm
File restored.
You'd think cvs would know about it now, right?
Let's redo a cvs up just to be sure.
$ cvs up
cvs update: move away Foo/Bar.pm;
