Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-10-01 at 14:31 +0100, Earle Martin wrote: > On 01/10/2007, Phil Pennock wrote: > > On 2007-10-01 at 11:22 +0100, Earle Martin wrote: > > > *BSD or the other extended relatives, so maybe this is normal in those > > > parts, much in the same way that you can marry your sister in some > > > d

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Peter da Silva
On 01-Oct-2007, at 09:56, David Cantrell wrote: Apparently, the version that ships with it now still doesn't. Neither does rsyncx. Been there, done that, got the "reinstall-from-scratch, rsyncx-hosed- my-metadata" blues. Filesystem metadata is hateful. Software that claims to maintain it

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread David Cantrell
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:31:03PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote: > I know it's bad taste to complain about other's hate, but this is > because rsyncx is quite old now. The version of rsync that *used* to > ship with Mac OS X didn't have the ability to sync mac meta-info, so > rsyncX shipped it'

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Earle Martin
On 01/10/2007, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2007-10-01 at 11:22 +0100, Earle Martin wrote: > > *BSD or the other extended relatives, so maybe this is normal in those > > parts, much in the same way that you can marry your sister in some > > distant tribes. > > *BSD uses /usr/local/. I could have phra

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Peter da Silva
On 01-Oct-2007, at 05:22, Earle Martin wrote: On this Mac OS X malarkey it's /opt/local, apparently. That's not OS X, that's Darwinports. My guess is they're copying Solaris.

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-10-01 at 11:22 +0100, Earle Martin wrote: > On this Mac OS X malarkey it's /opt/local, apparently. Even though AFAIK /opt/local/ is a MacOS-ism. /opt/pkgname is something Solaris, inter alia, uses and I think comes from one of those standards committees that issues vague edicts that peopl

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Patrick Quinn-Graham
On 1-Oct-07, at 11:22 AM, Earle Martin wrote: On 30/09/2007, Peter da Silva wrote: /usr/local is for standard stuff that doesn't come with the system. On this Mac OS X malarkey it's /opt/local, apparently. Even though there is a /usr/local. Which just strikes me as peculiar to say the least.

Re: RsyncX

2007-10-01 Thread Earle Martin
On 30/09/2007, Peter da Silva wrote: > /usr/local is for standard stuff that doesn't come with the system. > > If you're installing non-standard stuff, install it in /some/other/ > prefix. On this Mac OS X malarkey it's /opt/local, apparently. Even though there is a /usr/local. Which just strikes