Re: [offlist] Re: Rubygems require perl?

* Joshua Rodman [2007-08-21 01:35]: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:55:39AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > Hi Joshua, > > > > * Joshua Rodman [2007-08-21 00:30]: > > > True, and Apt is a wonderful tool that I love. [???] > > > > did you mean to send this to the list? > > Yes, apologies. All thos

Re: [offlist] Re: Rubygems require perl?

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:55:39AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > * Joshua Rodman [2007-08-21 00:30]: > > True, and Apt is a wonderful tool that I love. [???] > > did you mean to send this to the list? Yes, apologies. All those lists that munge reply-to have got me mistrained. -j

Re: [offlist] Re: Rubygems require perl?

Hi Joshua, * Joshua Rodman [2007-08-21 00:30]: > True, and Apt is a wonderful tool that I love. […] did you mean to send this to the list? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

[offlist] Re: Rubygems require perl?

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:58:54PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Michael G Schwern [2007-08-20 22:00]: > > dpkg started back in 1993. FreeBSD "port make macros" started > > in 1994. I doubt dpkg is a clone of ports. > > dpkg != APT True, and Apt is a wonderful tool that I love. But Debian's pa