Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-11 Thread David Cantrell
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:58:13AM +, h...@crypt.org wrote: As far as I remember, they used not so long ago to list -ise as the primary form and -ize as a US English variant. (Though I'm not sure the OED ever did that: see the mention of OUP in the first reference below.) The OED's entry

Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-11 Thread Peter da Silva
So since we're applying it to a French root, it should be caponise.

Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-10 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2008-02-09 at 09:55 -0600, Peter da Silva wrote: On 2008-02-09, at 04:39, Philip Newton wrote: I installed Adobe Reader God that's a hateful program, in so many ways. At one point I was running xpdf remotely and copying all my files to UNIX because I refused to install Adobe Reader on

Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-10 Thread Peter da Silva
On 2008-02-09, at 17:07, Phil Pennock wrote: For Firefox, there's the PDF Download extension to reduce the pain here. I also found out that you could just remove the bloody plugin component and still use Adobe Reader. Which is better, because it's so fucking hateful that even having to do

Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-10 Thread hv
Peter da Silva pe...@taronga.com wrote: :Is that caponizing or caponising? Spelling is hateful too. :) It's both, or either. The dictionaries disagree. For this and similar verbs, most UK English dictionaries seem these days to show both spellings as equal variants, but list -ize forms first to

Adobe Updater

2008-02-09 Thread Philip Newton
there. So why, dear Adobe Updater, do you want to upgrade my reader to 8.1.2 _German_? How could this possibly be a reasonably decision, given that I installed the English version and my application interface language is specifically English? (I double-checked just be sure.) I mean, new versions

Re: Adobe Updater

2008-02-09 Thread Peter da Silva
On 2008-02-09, at 04:39, Philip Newton wrote: I installed Adobe Reader God that's a hateful program, in so many ways. At one point I was running xpdf remotely and copying all my files to UNIX because I refused to install Adobe Reader on Windows because EVERY time I ran it it went and

Adobe Updater

2007-12-19 Thread Darrell Fuhriman
Why does it take 100% of the CPU for 10 minutes to download an 85MB update? That's not even installing it – just downloading it. I'm pretty sure wget doesn't use 100% of the CPU. Safari might use 100% of physical memory doing that, but still not 100% of the CPU. What the hell, Adobe?

Re: Adobe Updater

2007-12-19 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
It's converting the bits into beautifully rendered PDF images of bits for downloading them? On Dec 19, 2007 3:05 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org wrote: Why does it take 100% of the CPU for 10 minutes to download an 85MB update? That's not even installing it – just downloading it. I'm