Re: Dear Finder search

2005-11-03 Thread Matt McLeod
Stig Brautaset wrote: > On 2 Nov 2005, at 11:25, Peter da Silva wrote: > >>Please to be not sucky! > > > >Are you talking about classic Finder search in 10.3 or below, or > >the new All Your Search Belong To Spotlight in 10.4? > > I was using the Finder search in 10.4; using Spotlight didn't eve

Re: Dear Finder search

2005-11-02 Thread Stig Brautaset
On 2 Nov 2005, at 11:25, Peter da Silva wrote: Please to be not sucky! Are you talking about classic Finder search in 10.3 or below, or the new All Your Search Belong To Spotlight in 10.4? I was using the Finder search in 10.4; using Spotlight didn't even cross my mind. Now I see that Spo

Re: Dear Finder search

2005-11-02 Thread Luke Kanies
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Peter da Silva wrote: > Are you talking about classic Finder search in 10.3 or below, or the > new All Your Search Belong To Spotlight in 10.4? Heh, I often wonder if I should be using Spotlight. I tried it a few times at first, but then I swapped that keystroke back to Quick

Re: Dear Finder search

2005-11-02 Thread Peter da Silva
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:55 AM, Stig Brautaset wrote: Please to be not sucky! Are you talking about classic Finder search in 10.3 or below, or the new All Your Search Belong To Spotlight in 10.4?

Dear Finder search

2005-11-02 Thread Stig Brautaset
Please to be not sucky! Searching for "Foo" in my home directory returns lots of hits, but clicking on each one in turn (and having to do this is almost worthy of a hate on its own) shows that they are each in ~/.Trash. Hmm... so I look for a quick way out to "ignore stuff in Trash", but no