On Jan 21, 2008 1:27 AM, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
>
> I am pissed that Google Video only searches YouTube, and not the myriad
> other video sites. But that probably is outside the scope of software hate.
It's outside the scope of any hate at all, I'm afraid...
http://video.google.com/videosearc
On 2008-01-21, at 08:34, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Actually the way I remember it, in-browser replay always used the
Flash player. However, you could download almost everything, and
the download was always provided in whatever format the original
video was in.
Ah, right. I misremembered, sorry
* Peter da Silva [2008-01-21 10:55]:
> Google Video didn't force everything to be wrapped in an
> infinitely hateful flash player. If the original format was
> something that could be played in a common plugin, it just
> handed that out.
Actually the way I remember it, in-browser replay always us
On 2008-01-21, at 03:27, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
No. YouTube worked better than Google Video.
o_O
Google Video didn't force everything to be wrapped in an infinitely
hateful flash player. If the original format was something that could
be played in a common plugin, it just handed that out
On 21/01/08 09:15 Peter da Silva wrote:
Anyone else pissed that Google did that with Google Video when they
bought Youtube?
No. YouTube worked better than Google Video.
I am pissed that Google Video only searches YouTube, and not the myriad
other video sites. But that probably is outside th
