Re: Websites that require a username

2006-10-06 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:16:48AM -0700, David King wrote: > >We already have something that can uniquely identify someone, and > >these > >sites already require users to give it to them. What's that, you > >ask? Why > >it's an email address. > Sure, an email address has one person, but a pers

Re: Websites that require a username

2006-10-05 Thread Patrick Quinn-Graham
On 5-Oct-06, at 9:16 AM, David King wrote: We already have something that can uniquely identify someone, and these sites already require users to give it to them. What's that, you ask? Why it's an email address. Sure, an email address has one person, but a person can have many email addr

Re: Websites that require a username

2006-10-05 Thread Juerd
David King skribis 2006-10-05 9:16 (-0700): > Sure, an email address has one person An email address can have multiple persons. In organized form this is called a mailing list, but it also exists in non-organized form. Then it's often just an alias pointing to multiple other addresses. -- korajn

Re: Websites that require a username

2006-10-05 Thread David King
We already have something that can uniquely identify someone, and these sites already require users to give it to them. What's that, you ask? Why it's an email address. Sure, an email address has one person, but a person can have many email addresses, and a person occasionally gains and lo

Websites that require a username

2006-10-04 Thread Zach White
I had a long rant typed out here about the USPS, and their use of logins to do something as simple as print a label and buy postage for the package at the same time. The rant didn't read very well, and boiled down to this: YOU DON'T NEED ME TO COME UP WITH A UNIQUE LOGIN NAME. For years now I've