* jrod...@hate.spamportal.net [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:24:10 -0700]:
> This isn't really true.
Shrug.
> debian-archive-keyring is a near-necessity for debian developers. It is
> the package which includes the gpg/pgp keys of every debian developer.
> That's a _lot_ of keys. Every debian developer
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:08:35PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Rafael Garcia-Suarez [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:02:59 +0200]:
>
> > Well, but so, why apt didn't upgrade itself, pulling it that new
> > dependency as a side-effect? Some other hateful behaviour?
>
> Because you're supposed to install
* Rafael Garcia-Suarez [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:02:59 +0200]:
> Well, but so, why apt didn't upgrade itself, pulling it that new
> dependency as a side-effect? Some other hateful behaviour?
Because you're supposed to install recommended packages unless you explicitly
know you don't want them. apt rec
On 05/06/06, Earle Martin wrote:
Apparently debian-archive-keyring is now supposed to be a pre-req for apt:
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2006/01/msg00136.html
Well, but so, why apt didn't upgrade itself, pulling it that new
dependency as a side-effect? Some other hateful behaviour?
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:13:10PM +0100, Earle Martin wrote:
> W: GPG error: http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
> NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these pro
r...@pulsar:~$ apt-get update
[ some output nusked for brevity ]
Fetched 38.5kB in 4s (8510B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W:
