Anyone else pissed that Google did that with Google Video when they
bought Youtube?
I thought I was the only one!
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:16:55PM +1030, Bill Page wrote:
Anyone else pissed that Google did that with Google Video when they
bought Youtube?
I thought I was the only one!
I too am pissed about that.
I'm also pissed that *anyone* gave those youtube yahoos any money at
all. There are
On 2008-01-21, at 23:59, jrod...@hate.spamportal.net wrote:
I suppose this is now business hate.
Business hate? HP!
Just about every place I can think of where HP and Compaq had
competing products, they dumped the good one and kept the bad one.
And it wasn't just that they kept HP's
!
Except, of course, they'd all be saying PIN number.
Now that we finally log in, half the links are broken. They're all
http://http//flexcar.com/... Good job on your URL rewriter, guys! Every
other click dumps me onto http.com which I'm sure they love.
We were here to reserve a car, so let's
On Jan 21, 2008, at 0:29, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Fortunately Flexcar has been bought out by Zipcar. Zipcar's system
still has the neighborhood / zip code thinking, but at least they
use Google Maps so I can bypass all that. Hopefully they'll wisely
trash the Flexcar site.
They'll
On 2008-01-21, at 02:01, John Sinteur wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 0:29, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Fortunately Flexcar has been bought out by Zipcar. Zipcar's
system still has the neighborhood / zip code thinking, but at
least they use Google Maps so I can bypass all that. Hopefully
they'll
On 21/01/08 09:15 Peter da Silva wrote:
Anyone else pissed that Google did that with Google Video when they
bought Youtube?
No. YouTube worked better than Google Video.
I am pissed that Google Video only searches YouTube, and not the myriad
other video sites. But that probably is outside
On 2008-01-21, at 03:27, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
No. YouTube worked better than Google Video.
o_O
Google Video didn't force everything to be wrapped in an infinitely
hateful flash player. If the original format was something that could
be played in a common plugin, it just handed that
* Peter da Silva pe...@taronga.com [2008-01-21 10:55]:
Google Video didn't force everything to be wrapped in an
infinitely hateful flash player. If the original format was
something that could be played in a common plugin, it just
handed that out.
Actually the way I remember it, in-browser
On 2008-01-21, at 08:34, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Actually the way I remember it, in-browser replay always used the
Flash player. However, you could download almost everything, and
the download was always provided in whatever format the original
video was in.
Ah, right. I misremembered,
On Jan 21, 2008 1:27 AM, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pissed that Google Video only searches YouTube, and not the myriad
other video sites. But that probably is outside the scope of software hate.
It's outside the scope of any hate at all, I'm afraid...
11 matches
Mail list logo
