Hi Eric/Tim,
Thanks for your appreciable points.
I have updated the Mapper implementation removing Htable instance, as
follows
public static class InnerMapWithTOF extends MapReduceBase implements
Mapper {
public void map(LongWritable key, Text value,
Thanks for the quick reply. My alternate approach is to just let the mappers
do their writes, and to retrieve values based on the timestamp of the last
*successful* run, which should effectively filter out the results of failed
runs. It sounds like it may be my only option.
I suppose it might a
I think I have the largest tables, a pair of tables (dual indexes)
that have over 9b rows. With LZO the compressed on disk size is about
500gb each. Obviously each row is fairly small.
-ryan
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Murali Krishna.
P wrote:
> Hi,
> Apologize if this is already answere
Hey all,
Just writing a quick note of "thanks", we had another solid group of
people show up! As always, we learned quite a lot about interesting
use cases for Hadoop, Lucene, and the rest of the Apache 'Cloud
Stack'.
I couldn't get it taped, but we talked about:
-Scaling Lucene with Katta and
FYI, the name of the zk jar has the zk svn revision we patched and the hbase
issue number whose patch it includes.
St.Ack
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Ram Kulbak wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that hbase 0.20.0-alpha comes with a non official zookeeper
> jar
> (zookeeper-r785019-hbase-1329.jar)
No.
They are on their way. They were just not ready in time for alpha preview
release.
Keep an eye on the dev list so you can see when they go in.
Yours,
St.Ack
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Ram Kulbak wrote:
> Hi,
> I can't find the classes TrasnactionalTable, IndexedTable or any of the
Hi,
I can't find the classes TrasnactionalTable, IndexedTable or any of the
indexed or transactional functionality in hbase 0.20.0-alpha, is this a
mistake?
Thanks,
Ram
Unfortunately, there is no more documentation on transactions.
I've never used transactions in M/Rs. You are correct that if you only
start/commit a transaction in mapper then you will only get atomicity across
the individual map.
One thing to keep in mind is that, in the current impl, all the wr
I use the existing jar and a zk 3.1.1 server.
HBASE-1329 is about providing more visibility into ZK from hbase
standard tools. There are no other major changes.
so, yes. please leave the jar in place, but feel free to use a 3.1.1 server
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Ram Kulbak wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
I've noticed that hbase 0.20.0-alpha comes with a non official zookeeper jar
(zookeeper-r785019-hbase-1329.jar).
Can I deploy hbase 0.20.0-alpha with zookeeper 3.1.1 ?
Thanks,
Ram
10 matches
Mail list logo