I opened a ticket for 3.0 for the same issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-675
vote for it if you thanks we need it.
Billy
"Naama Kraus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, both questions are around the same topic (sorry for being buggy
about
it :-
Well, both questions are around the same topic (sorry for being buggy about
it :-) though I am not sure they are identical.
What I was trying to understand in this post - in a future implementation of
TableSplit#getLocations(), will it return the HRegion server node of the
split, or the nodes whe
Naama,
I think that Jim already answered your questions in this thread
http://markmail.org/message/jdf2mfg3g2tsiswe
J-D
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Naama Kraus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've peeked at HBase code, TableSplit#getLocations(). I noticed that the
> method returns a
Hi,
I've peeked at HBase code, TableSplit#getLocations(). I noticed that the
method returns a random node for now. I was trying to think what should be
returned if one wishes to have computation close to data. As a table split
is per region, I could think of returning the node managing that region