Re: Moving HBase MR computation close to data

2008-07-14 Thread Billy Pearson
I opened a ticket for 3.0 for the same issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-675 vote for it if you thanks we need it. Billy "Naama Kraus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, both questions are around the same topic (sorry for being buggy about it :-

Re: Moving HBase MR computation close to data

2008-07-14 Thread Naama Kraus
Well, both questions are around the same topic (sorry for being buggy about it :-) though I am not sure they are identical. What I was trying to understand in this post - in a future implementation of TableSplit#getLocations(), will it return the HRegion server node of the split, or the nodes whe

Re: Moving HBase MR computation close to data

2008-07-14 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Naama, I think that Jim already answered your questions in this thread http://markmail.org/message/jdf2mfg3g2tsiswe J-D On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Naama Kraus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've peeked at HBase code, TableSplit#getLocations(). I noticed that the > method returns a

Moving HBase MR computation close to data

2008-07-13 Thread Naama Kraus
Hi, I've peeked at HBase code, TableSplit#getLocations(). I noticed that the method returns a random node for now. I was trying to think what should be returned if one wishes to have computation close to data. As a table split is per region, I could think of returning the node managing that region