Re: 0.20 REST interface

2009-07-23 Thread Eric Tschetter
That's fine. My 0.19.3 setup started up the rest server by default on port 60010 (at least, I don't remember doing anything to turn it on) so I had assumed the 0.20 one would as well. As you say, it's easy enough to fire one up... --Eric Tschetter a Ona Ta hu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:06 PM, stack w

Re: 0.20 REST interface

2009-07-23 Thread stack
Hmm. I remember in old days that we used to deploy the REST api on the master but that was shut off a while ago. Thought was that no one was using it -- sorry (I don't have the hbase issue to hand) -- and its easy enough putting up an explicit REST server if wanted. I'll let the REST lads talk t

Re: 0.20 REST interface

2009-07-23 Thread Eric Tschetter
Ah, so the rest server doesn't start up on it's own anymore with 0.20? I'm looking forward to messing around with stargate, but I already have some stuff that works with the old REST interface, so I'd like to make sure that's still working before moving on :). --Eric On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:09

Re: 0.20 REST interface

2009-07-23 Thread stack
Run: ./bin/hbase rest It outputs options. For example: ./bin/hbase rest start ... will start it in current console (on port 60050 by default). To start it as background process writing a pid, etc., do ./bin/hbase-daemon.sh start rest. That said, REST story is interesting in 0.20.0 in that th