Thanks, Jean-Daniel!
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> Boris,
>
> There is a quicker way but since we currently don't keep a count
> somewhere, it's always about doing a full table scan.
>
> See how the count is implemented in the shell to learn of the quicker
> way. Spe
Boris,
There is a quicker way but since we currently don't keep a count
somewhere, it's always about doing a full table scan.
See how the count is implemented in the shell to learn of the quicker
way. Specifically, look at bin/HBase.rb
J-D
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Boris Aleksandrovsky w
Hi,
Is there a way to retrieving the number of rows in the table without doing a
complete scan and counting the number of returned results (via next())?
--
Thanks,
Boris
