Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume

2014-06-05 Thread basile pinsard
Many thanks for the answers @Timothy I know that probtrackx2 support surfaces but I did not manage to make it work without hectic results (fiber crossing the surfaces used as stop, combinatorial counting of endpoints ... ), even if FSL seems the most able to process multi-shell data. @Donna I

Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume

2014-06-05 Thread basile pinsard
Hi Matt, Even if it is marginal a certain number of fibers are in the cortical and ROIs gray matter as assessed by fdt_paths.nii, I think I already mentioned this to Saad on fsl list. Have you been using the fsaverage32k surface as stop/targets or the full resolution (which I believe would

Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume

2014-06-05 Thread Glasser, Matthew
I’ve used the 32k mesh. Also I restrict the tracking mask not to allow stuff outside the brain (inverse of HCP distributed wmparc file minus the ventricles), so even a few fibers missed don’t go far (--mask= option). Not sure I understand your other point. Can you have another try at

Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume

2014-06-05 Thread Saad Jbabdi
Hi Basile et al. We will make this three-vertex count optional in the future, as I agree that it complicates interpretation of matrix1/3 output. Cheers Saad On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:30, Glasser, Matthew glass...@wusm.wustl.edumailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu wrote: You could do that but because

Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume

2014-06-05 Thread basile pinsard
Hi Saad, great, many thanks cheers basile On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Saad Jbabdi saad.jba...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk wrote: Hi Basile et al. We will make this three-vertex count optional in the future, as I agree that it complicates interpretation of matrix1/3 output. Cheers Saad