Hi all,
I am trying to run probtrackx using HCP preprocessed diffusion data and MMP1.0
ROIs.
To my understanding the corresponding T1w image of MMP1.0 ROIs is:
HCP_PhaseTwo / Q1-Q6_RelatedParcellation210 / MNINonLinear /
Q1-Q6_RelatedParcellation210_AverageT1w_restore.nii.gz
Is this a right
We are interested in small structures of the midbrain and would therefore like
to maximize our spatial resolution, at least go smaller than 2mm isotropic. Any
suggestions?
cheers
seb
From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016
There aren’t any surfaces specified either…
Matt.
From: Timothy Coalson >
Date: Monday, October 31, 2016 at 5:29 PM
To: Matt Glasser >
Cc: "Burgess, Gregory" >,
We will need to update the pipelines to work with FreeSurfer 6.0 when it is
released. Earlier versions of FreeSurfer did required the current approach to
get highres surface placement. Your approach is probably fine if it is
producing nice results for you. If you wish, you could send us the
The parcellation I mentioned below is CIFTI, so it will work without issue with
CIFTI fMRI data.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Timothy Coalson >
Date: Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM
To: "PALLARES PICAZO, VICENTE"
The instructions in part D of the pdf result in data that is already on the
fsaverage standard mesh. If what you are trying to do with mris_preproc is
just resample to fsaverage from subject native mesh, you can skip that step
entirely.
This step looks suspicious:
wb_command
The CIFTI fMRI data does not contain subcortical information outside those
defined ROIs. If you need to redefine them, you would need to get the data
from the volume fMRI files, and the resulting cifti files would be
challenging to compare/use with the released cifti data.
You can incorporate
Hi,
The current HCP structural pipeline was developed well before the forthcoming
FS version that will have improved support/processing of “hires” structurals.
In fact, parts of the HCP structural pipeline are there basically so that we
could refine the positioning of the surfaces to take full
Dear experts,
I was wondering, why do you run in FreeSurferPipeline the recon-all with
downsampled 1mm3 data?
It is due to the fact that you do not want to rely on development version of
FreeSurfer which only enables reconstruction of high resolution data (via -cm
or -hires option)? Isn't it
Hi,
We are trying to run a fMRI sequence on our PRISMA similar to the one used in
the HCP–lifespan but with 1.5mm isotropic voxels and a AP phase encoding
direction.
In the HCP sequence documents, it is mentioned that if we use AP phase encoding
we should use a FoV phase of 100%.
We seem to be
Ok, but is it possible then to use another NIFTI parcellation, for
instance, a functional parcellation, with the CIFTI fMRI data? Or, since
the subcortical regions are already defined in the CIFTI file, is not
possible to re-define these ROI?
Thank you again,
Vicente
On 29 October 2016 at
Hi David,
Here you go: https://balsa.wustl.edu/study/show/RVVG
Robert
From: hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org
on behalf of David Hofmann
Sent: 31 October 2016 10:23:51
To: Glasser, Matthew
Thank you Matthew,
can you tell me, where can I download the map?
Thanks
David
2016-10-29 22:04 GMT+02:00 Glasser, Matthew :
> Matlab can read CIFTI, see option B here: https://wiki.humanconnectome.
> org/display/PublicData/HCP+Users+FAQ
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From:
13 matches
Mail list logo