Thanks Karthik for the update, but the some documents are not included.
It looks to me that *.apt.vm files are not compiled.
Would you please generate documents with
'mvn site site:stage /path/to/deploy'?
I'm +1 (non-binding) if the documents are included.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/08/12 13:49), Kar
Can someone please verify the signatures on the new binary and the old
source tarballs to make sure it is all good? If it is, I believe we can go
ahead and close the vote.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> I have updated the binary tar ball to include the docs, by build
I have updated the binary tar ball to include the docs, by building the
docs locally and copying them over. Filed HADOOP-10956 to fix the
create-release script to handle this.
The RC is here: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0-RC2/
Please note that the binary tar ball is signed by a new
Jason Lowe created HDFS-6840:
Summary: Clients are always sent to the same datanode when read is
off rack
Key: HDFS-6840
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6840
Project: Hadoop HDFS
+1 non-binding
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Colin McCabe
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:40 PM
> To: Hadoop Common
> Cc: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org, yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org,
> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> +1.
>
> best,
> Colin
+1
From: Colin McCabe
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:40 PM
To: Hadoop Common
Cc: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org, yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org,
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
+1.
best,
Colin
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> I have put together this pro
+1.
best,
Colin
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic.
>
> Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
>
>1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control.
>2. Force-push to be
+1
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Kihwal Lee
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kihwal
>
> On 8/8/14, 9:57 PM, "Karthik Kambatla" wrote:
>
> >I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this
> >topic.
> >
> >Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
> >
> > 1. Migra
+1 (binding)
Kihwal
On 8/8/14, 9:57 PM, "Karthik Kambatla" wrote:
>I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this
>topic.
>
>Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
>
> 1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control.
> 2. Force-push to be disabled
Thank you for dealing with this problem, Karthik. It sounds reasonable
to me to update binary tarball without modifying source code.
+1(non-binding) to continue the voting.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> Thanks Akira for catching the missing docs. L
Charles Lamb created HDFS-6839:
--
Summary: Fix TestCLI to expect new output
Key: HDFS-6839
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6839
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-task
Affec
Thanks Akira for catching the missing docs. Let me work on *updating* the
binary tarball to include the docs *without* modifying the source. Will
send an update as soon as I sort that out.
The vote itself is on the source and the binary is just a convenience. I
hope we can let the vote continue so
Jing Zhao created HDFS-6838:
---
Summary: Code cleanup for unnecessary INode replacement
Key: HDFS-6838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6838
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving this, Karthik.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic.
>
> Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
>
>
+1.
Thanks,
Junping
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic.
>
> Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
>
>1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control.
>2. Force-pus
+1(non-binding)
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic.
>
> Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days.
>
>1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control.
>
-1 (non-binding).
* Downloaded source and verified signature.
* Built from source.
* Ran tests and some MR jobs.
* Ran RM-HA with manual failover mode.
- Documents are missing.
Good catch, Akira. As he mentioned, the documents including javadocs
are missing from the binary tar ball. We should inc
Hello,
i am a german IF student.
For my first studywork i need work with hdfs.
For this reason i need your API for server site hdfs.
this:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server. ...
with best regards
Eric Clausnitzer.
+1 (binding)
as this gets rolled out, I think we may also want define a branch naming
policy like feature/${JIRA}-text for features, as well as a policy for
deleting retired branches (tag the last commit then rm the branch)...then
we can cull some branches that are in SVN.
-steve
On 9 August 2
+1 (non-binding), also pending doc issue Akira found
- Brought up pseudo-distributed cluster from downloaded tarball
- Ran basic XAttr, ACL, snapshot commands successfully
Thanks,
Stephen
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), pending the document issue Aki
20 matches
Mail list logo
