Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2.10+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2020-03-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86/612/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc c

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15200) Delete Corrupt Replica Immediately Irrespective of Replicas On Stale Storage

2020-03-02 Thread Ayush Saxena (Jira)
Ayush Saxena created HDFS-15200: --- Summary: Delete Corrupt Replica Immediately Irrespective of Replicas On Stale Storage Key: HDFS-15200 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15200 Project: Ha

Re: HDFS-13616 : batch listing of multiple directories

2020-03-02 Thread Steve Loughran
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 00:23, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > Steve, > > You made a great point and I'm sorry this API was implemented without > consideration of other FS implementation. > Thank you for your direct feedback. > > async -- yes > builder -- yes > cancellable -- totally agree > > There are

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2020-03-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/1426/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc checkstyle java

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15201) SnapshotCounter hits MaxSnapshotID limit

2020-03-02 Thread Karthik Palanisamy (Jira)
Karthik Palanisamy created HDFS-15201: - Summary: SnapshotCounter hits MaxSnapshotID limit Key: HDFS-15201 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15201 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

[VOTE] EOL Hadoop branch-2.8

2020-03-02 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
I am sorry I forgot to start a VOTE thread. This is the "official" vote thread to mark branch-2.8 End of Life. This is based on the following thread and the tracking jira (HADOOP-16880 ). This vote will run for 7 days and conclude on March 9th (

Re: [VOTE] EOL Hadoop branch-2.8

2020-03-02 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1 for marking 2.8 EOL -Ayush > On 03-Mar-2020, at 12:18 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > I am sorry I forgot to start a VOTE thread. > > This is the "official" vote thread to mark branch-2.8 End of Life. This is > based on the following thread and the tracking jira (HADOOP-16880 >

This week's Hadoop storage community call

2020-03-02 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
Hi! I'd like to use this week's community call as an opportunity to drive the releases forward. RMs: Gabor and Brahma, would you be able to join the call? March 4th (Wednesday) US Pacific: 10am, GMT 6pm, India: 11:30pm Please join via Zoom: https://cloudera.zoom.us/j/880548968 Past meeting minu

[DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-03-02 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
Hi, Following the discussion to end branch-2.8, I want to start a discussion around what's next with branch-2.9. I am hesitant to use the word "end of life" but consider these facts: * 2.9.0 was released Dec 17, 2017. * 2.9.2, the last 2.9.x release, went out Nov 19 2018, which is more than 15 mo

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-03-02 Thread Sree Vaddi
+1 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 5:12 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: Hi, Following the discussion to end branch-2.8, I want to start a discussion around what's next with branch-2.9. I am hesitant to use the word "end of life" but consider these facts: * 2.9.0 was rel

Re: [VOTE] EOL Hadoop branch-2.8

2020-03-02 Thread Akira Ajisaka
+1 -Akira On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:55 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1 for marking 2.8 EOL > > -Ayush > > > On 03-Mar-2020, at 12:18 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > > > I am sorry I forgot to start a VOTE thread. > > > > This is the "official" vote thread to mark branch-2.8 End of Life. This > is >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Thirdparty 1.0.0

2020-03-02 Thread Ayush Saxena
Hi Vinay Thanx for driving the release. Verified checksums and tried building from source. Everything seems to be working fine. But I feel the concerns regarding licences are valid. IMO we should fix them and include HADOOP-16895 too in the release -Ayush > On 29-Feb-2020, at 1:45 AM, Vinayakumar