Thanks Viany for starting discussion.
+1
hadoop-thirdparty's release is required for 3.3.0 release because the
package includes shaded protobuf which 3.3.0 branch will depend on.
The plan sounds reasonable to me.
- Tsuyoshi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:31 AM Ayush Saxena wrote:
>
> Thanx Vinay fo
Thanx Vinay for initiating this.
+1, for the plan.
Good luck!!!
-Ayush
> On 21-Feb-2020, at 12:26 PM, Vinayakumar B wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Since Hadoop-3.3.0 release is around the corner, its time to release
> hadoop-thirdparty's first ever release, without which hadoop-3.3.0 cannot
> proceed
+1
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:22 AM Akira Ajisaka wrote:
> Thanks Vinayakumar for starting the discussion,
>
> +1 for the release plan.
> I think the release vote timeframe is now 5 days, not 7 days.
>
> -Akira
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:56 PM Vinayakumar B
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Sinc
Thanks Vinayakumar for starting the discussion,
+1 for the release plan.
I think the release vote timeframe is now 5 days, not 7 days.
-Akira
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:56 PM Vinayakumar B
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since Hadoop-3.3.0 release is around the corner, its time to release
> hadoop-thirdpa
Hi All,
Since Hadoop-3.3.0 release is around the corner, its time to release
hadoop-thirdparty's first ever release, without which hadoop-3.3.0 cannot
proceed for release.
Below are the tentative date for RC and release. Since there is no much
activity in this repo (other than the opentracing rel
