Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Thank you for your comments. I'll create a vote thread to mark 3.1.x EOL. -Akira On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:46 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1, to mark 3.1.x EOL. > Apache Hive does depends on 3.1.0 as of now, but due to guave upgrade on > branch-3.1, the attempt to migrate to latest 3.1.x didn’t

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

+1, to mark 3.1.x EOL. Apache Hive does depends on 3.1.0 as of now, but due to guave upgrade on branch-3.1, the attempt to migrate to latest 3.1.x didn’t work for me atleast couple of months back. So, mostly 3.3.1 would be the only option replacing 3.1.0 there or at worst 3.3.2 in a couple of mo

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

+1 to EOL 3.1.x at least. > On May 23, 2021, at 9:51 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang > wrote: > > Sean, > > For reasons I don't understand, I never received emails from your new > address in the mailing list. Only Akira's response. > > I was just able to start a thread like this. > > I am +1 to EOL 3.1

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Sean, For reasons I don't understand, I never received emails from your new address in the mailing list. Only Akira's response. I was just able to start a thread like this. I am +1 to EOL 3.1.5. Reason? Spark is already on Hadoop 3.2. Hive and Tez are actively working to support Hadoop 3.3. HBas

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Thanks Sean and Akira for discussion here. > As you commented, the confluence wiki pages for Hadoop releases were out of date. Updated [1]. Just update Roadmap[1] for 3.2.2 and updated/added issues collections for 3.2.3[2] which will be useful if you are interested in becoming a release manager of

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Hi Sean, Thank you for starting the discussion. I think branch-2.10, branch-3.1, branch-3.2, branch-3.3, and trunk (3.4.x) are actively maintained. The next releases will be: - 3.4.0 - 3.3.1 (Thanks, Wei-Chiu!) - 3.2.3 - 3.1.5 - 2.10.2 > Are there folks willing to go through being release manag

[DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

Hi folks! Which release lines do we as a community still consider actively maintained? I found an earlier discussion[1] where we had consensus to consider branches that don’t get maintenance releases on a regular basis end-of-life for practical purposes. The result of that discussion was writ