Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

are >> addressing as follow-on tasks in Phase I, we would label them with "erasure >> coding" and maybe also set the target version as "2.9" for the convenience? >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: Jing Zhao [mailto:ji.

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

we would label them with "erasure > coding" and maybe also set the target version as "2.9" for the convenience? > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Jing Zhao [mailto:ji...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 201

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

--Original Message- >> From: Jing Zhao [mailto:ji...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:04 AM >> To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 >> (erasure coding) branch to trunk] >> &g

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

We used to get help from Bigtop when it comes to integration testing. Do we think that's possible for 2.8? On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 2 Nov 2015, at 23:11, Vinod Vavilapalli > wrote: > > > > Yes, I’ve already

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

I don't really see the difference between 2.9 with a ton of scary changes (EC is a lot more NN stuff than a usual release) and a 3.0. What's the downside of getting a major version. It relaxes the compat a little bit. It would allow some bake time before it's stable. Put another way. I'm

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

Yes we can mostly likely help you. Please come over to dev@bigtop. > On Nov 4, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > > We used to get help from Bigtop when it comes to integration testing. Do we > think that's possible for 2.8? > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM,

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

From: Jing Zhao [mailto:ji...@apache.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:04 AM > > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 > (erasure coding) branch to trunk] > > > > +1 for the plan about Phase I

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

> On 2 Nov 2015, at 23:11, Vinod Vavilapalli wrote: > > Yes, I’ve already started looking at 2.8.0, that is exactly how I ended up > with this discussion on the state of EC. > > +Vinod > > > On Nov 2, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Haohui Mai >

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

; Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:04 AM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 > (erasure coding) branch to trunk] > > +1 for the plan about Phase I & II. > > BTW, maybe out of the scope of this

RE: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk] If we use an umbrella JIRA to categorize all the ongoing EC work, that will let us more easily change the target version later. For instance, if we decide to bump

Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

rticipated in this discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With 7 +1's (5 binding and 2 non-binding), and no -1, this vote >> has >>>>>> passed. >>>>>>> I will do a final 'git merge' with trunk and work with Andrew to >

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks everyone who has participated in this discussion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> With 7 +1's (5 binding and 2 non-binding), and no -1,

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

t; >>>>>> feature! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Zhe Zhang < > zhezh...@cloudera.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

t;> trunk. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks all for the contribution. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Yi Liu >>>>>>>>> >>>

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

; >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Andrew Wang < > > > >> andrew.w...@cloudera.com> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Branch has been merged to trunk, thanks a

RE: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:41 AM To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk] +1 for EC to go into 2.9. Yes, 3.x would be long way to go when we plan +to have 2.8 and 2.9 releases

RE: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

e according to the rough release date. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:41 AM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [W

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

al Message- > > From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:41 AM > > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 > > (erasure coding) branch to trunk] > >

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

;>>>>> passed. >>>>>>>>> I will do a final 'git merge' with trunk and work with Andrew to >>>>> merge >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> branch to trunk. I'll update on this thread when the merge is >&g

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

Yes, I’ve already started looking at 2.8.0, that is exactly how I ended up with this discussion on the state of EC. +Vinod On Nov 2, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Haohui Mai > wrote: Is it a good time to start the discussion on the issues of releasing 2.8?

Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

the convenience? > > -Original Message- > From: Jing Zhao [mailto:ji...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:04 AM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 > (erasure coding) branch to trunk

RE: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]

..@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:04 AM To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk] +1 for the plan about Phase I & II. BTW, maybe out of the scope of this thread, just want to mentio

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

this thread when the merge is > done. > > > >> > > > > >> > --- > > > >> > Zhe Zhang > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Liu, Yi A <yi.a@intel.com> > > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

;>wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > (Change it to binding.) > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > I have been involved in the development and code review on the > > >>feature > > >> > > br

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

gt; > (Change it to binding.) >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > I have been involved in the development and code review on the >>feature >> > > branch. It's a great feature and I think it's ready to merge it into >> > trunk. >> > &

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

1:08 PM, Liu, Yi A <yi.a@intel.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> > > (Change it to binding.) > >> > > > >> > > +1 > >> > > I have been involved in the development and code review on the > >>feature

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

all for the contribution. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Yi Liu > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Liu, Yi A > > > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:51 PM > > > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

rds, > > Yi Liu > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Liu, Yi A > > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:51 PM > > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk > > >

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

e contribution. > > Regards, > Yi Liu > > > -Original Message- > From: Liu, Yi A > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:51 PM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk > > +1 (non-bin

RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

25, 2015 1:51 PM To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk +1 (non-binding) I have been involved in the development and code review on the feature branch. It's a great feature and I think it's ready to merge it into trunk. Thanks all

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

gt; > it's sorted out and hope it helps. > > Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:50 AM > > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop

RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:21 PM To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk +1, I've been involved starting from design and development of ErasureCoding. I think phase 1 of this development is ready to be merged to trunk. It had

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

mber 23, 2015 8:50 AM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk > > +1 > > Great addition to HDFS. Thanks all contributors for the nice work. > > Regards, > Uma > > On 9/22/15,

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

+1 Great addition to HDFS. Thanks all contributors for the nice work. Regards, Uma On 9/22/15, 3:40 PM, "Zhe Zhang" wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to propose a vote to merge the HDFS-7285 feature branch back to >trunk. Since November 2014 we have been designing and developing

RE: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk +1 Great addition to HDFS. Thanks all contributors for the nice work. Regards, Uma On 9/22/15, 3:40 PM, "Zhe Zhang" <zhezh...@cloudera.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk

+1 I've been involved in design discussions and reviews on the branch, I think we're ready to merge to trunk. Stability has looked good in cluster testing. Many thanks to all the contributors for their hard work! Best, Andrew On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Zhe Zhang