: [DISCUSS] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7
Uma,
Voting periods are defined in *minimum* terms, so it already covers what you'd
like to see i.e. the vote can continue longer.
thanks,
Arun
> On Jun 21, 2014, at 2:19 AM, "Gangumalla, Uma"
> wrote:
>
> H
Thanks everyone. I'll start a vote tmrw if there are no objections.
Arun
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1, sounds good!
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
> > t
+1, sounds good!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> +1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
> time!)
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vino...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This seems reasonable, +1.
> >
> > In cas
+1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
time!)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vino...@apache.org> wrote:
> This seems reasonable, +1.
>
> In case there is inactivity, we already extend dates even today, we can do
> the same going forwa
This seems reasonable, +1.
In case there is inactivity, we already extend dates even today, we can do the
same going forward.
I don't see major disagreements, time to start a vote?
Thanks
+Vinod
On Jun 20, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose we change ou
I¹d be fine with 5 days. Any shorter and you could have issues with folks
being just out for a weekend and miss the entire vote unless we explicitly
tried to stay away from ending the vote on the weekend.
Tom
On 6/21/14, 12:54 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
>Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose we ch
+1 binding. Thanks, Arun.
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Arun C. Murthy
wrote:
> Uma,
>
> Voting periods are defined in *minimum* terms, so it already covers what
> you'd like to see i.e. the vote can continue longer.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
Uma,
Voting periods are defined in *minimum* terms, so it already covers what you'd
like to see i.e. the vote can continue longer.
thanks,
Arun
> On Jun 21, 2014, at 2:19 AM, "Gangumalla, Uma"
> wrote:
>
> How about proposing vote for 5days and give chance to RM for extending vote
> for 2m
+1. Non-binding.
Thanks,
Junping
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose we change our by-laws to reduce our voting periods on
> new releases from 7 days to 5.
>
> Currently, it just takes too long to turn around releases; particularly
> if we
How about proposing vote for 5days and give chance to RM for extending vote for
2more days( total to 7days) if the rc did not receive enough vote within 5days?
If a rc received enough votes in 5days, RM can close vote.
I can see an advantage of 7days voting is, that will cover all the week and
w
10 matches
Mail list logo
