Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-22 Thread Junping Du
uesday, November 21, 2017 7:45 PM To: Junping Du; Konstantin Shvachko Cc: Wangda Tan; Andrew Wang; Zheng, Kai; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan Agree with Kons

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Weiwei Yang
pache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan Thanks Junping for driving this. For the bug fix vs. improvement, it is actually very hard to define, improvement could be self-contained and useful, bug fix could be dangerous in some cases. To me, If an improvement fixed so

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Konstantin Shvachko
2 AM > To: Andrew Wang > Cc: Junping Du; Zheng, Kai; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; > hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; > yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan > > Thanks Junping for driving this. > > For the bug

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Junping Du
fs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan Thanks Junping for driving this. For the bug fix vs. improvement, it is actually very hard to define, improvement could be self-contained and useful, bug fix could be dan

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Wangda Tan
rade story here. > > > > > > Pls let me know what you think. Thanks! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Junping > > > > > > -- > > *From:* Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> > > *S

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Andrew Wang
gt; > Pls let me know what you think. Thanks! > > > > Thanks, > > > Junping > > > -- > *From:* Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> > *Sent:* Monday, November 20, 2017 10:22 PM > *To:* Zheng, Kai > *Cc:* Junping Du

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Daniel Templeton
Doh.  Mailer dropped some of the lists.  Replying again to avoid fragmenting the discussion... Still +1 to Andrew's comments. Daniel On 11/21/17 7:53 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote: +1 Daniel On 11/20/17 10:22 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm against including new features in maintenance releases,

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-21 Thread Junping Du
ber 20, 2017 10:22 PM To: Zheng, Kai Cc: Junping Du; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan I'm against including new features in maintenance releases, since they're meant to

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-20 Thread Andrew Wang
> > > >> If we're struggling with being able to deliver new features in a safe > and timely fashion, let's try to address that... > > This is interesting. Do you aware any means to do that? Thanks! > > I've mentioned this a few times on the lists before, but our biggest gap in keeping branches

RE: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-20 Thread Zheng, Kai
ping Du <j...@hortonworks.com>; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan I'm against including new features in maintenance releases, since they're meant to be bug-fix only. If

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-20 Thread Andrew Wang
I'm against including new features in maintenance releases, since they're meant to be bug-fix only. If we're struggling with being able to deliver new features in a safe and timely fashion, let's try to address that, not overload the meaning of "maintenance release". Best, Andrew On Mon, Nov

RE: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

2017-11-20 Thread Zheng, Kai
Hi Junping, Thank you for making 2.8.2 happen and now planning the 2.8.3 release. I have an ask, is it convenient to include the back port work for OSS connector module? We have some Hadoop users that wish to have it by default for convenience, though in the past they used it by back porting