Filed HDFS-4114. I think it's a regular code change like MR-2736.
Thanks,
Eli
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> It's been 10 days or so: Eli, do you want to file a JIRA to remove this
> code?
>
> Do we need to call a vote of any kind, or is this treated as a code change
> whe
It's been 10 days or so: Eli, do you want to file a JIRA to remove this
code?
Do we need to call a vote of any kind, or is this treated as a code change
where the normal processes apply?
-Todd
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> I'm also in favor of removing them. I've fie
I'm also in favor of removing them. I've fielded many questions from users
about their status, how they compare to other daemons that exist, etc. All
I've seen them do is increase confusion among users and be a maintenance
burden on developers.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On M
Agreed, it's been a maintenance burden, and no one using it or actively
maintaining it (except for those of us working on other areas of the code
who have to spend time maintaining it).
-Todd
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> Is anyone using the BackupNode and
Hey gang,
Is anyone using the BackupNode and/or CheckpointNode? I'm not aware
of anyone using them, and the only outstanding related jira is
HDFS-2064, which has been open for over a year and doesn't seem to be
making progress. For the past three years the code has only been
maintained as part
