Many allocated memory pointera of libhdfs maybe null, which maybe cause
coredump.
-
Key: HDFS-1097
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1097
Project: Hadoop HD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon reassigned HDFS-895:
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
> Allow hflush/sync to occur in parallel with new writes to the file
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-895:
-
Attachment: hdfs-895.txt
Here's a preliminary patch against 0.20 sync (will forward port it, but HBase
on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857274#action_12857274
]
André Oriani commented on HDFS-1031:
Adding hudson results, including the log for faile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857357#action_12857357
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-966:
---
I think we do not introduce any new complexity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857435#action_12857435
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1078:
Looks good to me. I ran ant compile -Dcompi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
dhruba borthakur resolved HDFS-983.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
I have not seen this problem after we imported the patch from HADOOP-6522
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Boris Shkolnik reassigned HDFS-1096:
Assignee: Boris Shkolnik
> allow dfsadmin/mradmin refresh of superuser proxy group mappings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857500#action_12857500
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-1096:
I think the static hash-maps proxyH
Fix Javadoc for DistributedCache usage
--
Key: HDFS-1098
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1098
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: documentation
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857540#action_12857540
]
Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-1031:
---
HDFS has metasave command that provides this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Boris Shkolnik updated HDFS-1096:
-
Attachment: HDFS-1096-BP20-6.patch
addressing comments
> allow dfsadmin/mradmin refresh of superu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857561#action_12857561
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1061:
---
Patch lgtm. I wonder if we should limit the number of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857563#action_12857563
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-909:
--
I see it passed Hudson
http://hudson.zon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857571#action_12857571
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-1014:
test-patch results
[exec] +1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hong Tang updated HDFS-1061:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Memory footprint optimization for INodeFile object.
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hong Tang updated HDFS-1061:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Retry hudson per Eli's suggestion.
> Memory footprint optimization for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857575#action_12857575
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-966:
--
I don't think there is. Looking in the c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Boris Shkolnik updated HDFS-1096:
-
Attachment: HDFS-1096-BP20-6-fix.patch
fix for the patch
> allow dfsadmin/mradmin refresh of sup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857606#action_12857606
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1061:
-
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-895:
-
Attachment: hdfs-895-trunk.txt
Here's a patch against trunk. There are a couple TODOs in there with questio
Add test for umask backward compatibility
-
Key: HDFS-1099
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1099
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Test
Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0
Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suresh Srinivas updated HDFS-1099:
--
Attachment: HDFS-1099.patch
New patch with test case from 0.20 version of the patch ported to tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-895:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Affects Version/s: 0.22.0
Fix Version/s: 0.22.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amareshwari Sriramadasu resolved HDFS-1098.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
DistributedCache is changed to use new api in branch 0.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857681#action_12857681
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1031:
if u run metasave on a namenode that ahs an
26 matches
Mail list logo