[jira] Created: (HDFS-1189) Quota counts missed between clear quota and set quota

2010-06-07 Thread Xiao Kang (JIRA)
Quota counts missed between clear quota and set quota - Key: HDFS-1189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1189 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1190) Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Ames (JIRA)
Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode. - Key: HDFS-1190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1190 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Components:

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1190) Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Ames (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Ames updated HDFS-1190: Attachment: HDFS-1190.patch Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1190) Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Ames (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Ames updated HDFS-1190: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1189) Quota counts missed between clear quota and set quota

2010-06-07 Thread Xiao Kang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HDFS-1189: Attachment: HDFS-1189.patch Patch attached. Replace INodeDirectoryWithQuota back to INodeDirectory if

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-503) Implement erasure coding as a layer on HDFS

2010-06-07 Thread shravankumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876178#action_12876178 ] shravankumar commented on HDFS-503: --- Thank you sir. Implement erasure coding as a layer

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Zhang (JIRA)
SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition Key: HDFS-1191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-503) Implement erasure coding as a layer on HDFS

2010-06-07 Thread shravankumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876187#action_12876187 ] shravankumar commented on HDFS-503: --- Hello sir, 1. what is the meaning for this srcPath

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Zhang updated HDFS-1191: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Jeff Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Zhang updated HDFS-1191: - Attachment: HDFS_1191.patch Attach the patch which add a workaround to get the real ip rather than the

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Jakob Homan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876195#action_12876195 ] Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-1191: --- This has also been dealt with in HDFS-1080, for which

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1190) Remove unused getNamenode() method from DataNode.

2010-06-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876196#action_12876196 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1190: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876215#action_12876215 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1191: --- Also check out HDFS-62 SecondaryNameNode give the

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1170) Add more assertions to TestLargeDirectoryDelete

2010-06-07 Thread Steve Loughran (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876228#action_12876228 ] Steve Loughran commented on HDFS-1170: -- contrib tests are going to be unrelated; this

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876245#action_12876245 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1191: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread Hairong Kuang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876331#action_12876331 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HDFS-1057: - The new patch is in a good shape! More comments

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1186) 0.20: DNs should interrupt writers at start of recovery

2010-06-07 Thread Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876367#action_12876367 ] Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HDFS-1186: --- I'm having trouble applying this

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1080) SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use the defined http address rather than local ip address

2010-06-07 Thread Jakob Homan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HDFS-1080: -- Attachment: HDFS-1080-trunk.patch Patch for trunk. Exactly the same as the 20 patch, which we've

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1080) SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use the defined http address rather than local ip address

2010-06-07 Thread Jakob Homan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HDFS-1080: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Submitting patch. SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1191) SecondaryNameNode give the loopback address (127.0.0.1) to NameNode under some condition

2010-06-07 Thread Jakob Homan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876375#action_12876375 ] Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-1191: --- By which I meant HDFS-62... doh. SecondaryNameNode

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1080) SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use the defined http address rather than local ip address

2010-06-07 Thread gary murry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876376#action_12876376 ] gary murry commented on HDFS-1080: -- This should be fine without new unit tests. It has

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-62) SecondaryNamenode may report incorrect info host name

2010-06-07 Thread Jakob Homan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876377#action_12876377 ] Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-62: - Seeing as there hasn't been any movement on this in more

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread sam rash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876380#action_12876380 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1057: I am addressing the last comments. I have one more

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread Hairong Kuang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876389#action_12876389 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HDFS-1057: - The append design document discussed this

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1186) 0.20: DNs should interrupt writers at start of recovery

2010-06-07 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876404#action_12876404 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1186: --- Hey Nicolas. Sorry, looks like I never uploaded my

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-142) In 0.20, move blocks being written into a blocksBeingWritten directory

2010-06-07 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-142: - Attachment: recover-rbw-v2.txt New version of the dont-recover-rbw patch (this is what I've been testing

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread sam rash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876410#action_12876410 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1057: hmm, i can remove the test case. one of our internal tools

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1192) refreshSuperUserGroupsConfiguration should use server side configuration for the refresh

2010-06-07 Thread Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)
refreshSuperUserGroupsConfiguration should use server side configuration for the refresh Key: HDFS-1192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1192

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread sam rash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sam rash updated HDFS-1057: --- Attachment: hdfs-1057-trunk-3.txt 1. endOffset is either bytesOnDisk or the chunkChecksum.getDataLength() 2.

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

2010-06-07 Thread sam rash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876424#action_12876424 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1057: also disabled out the test on read of immediate file for

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1080) SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use the defined http address rather than local ip address

2010-06-07 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876423#action_12876423 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-1080: --- # You might want also to remove the

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1080) SecondaryNameNode image transfer should use the defined http address rather than local ip address

2010-06-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876470#action_12876470 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1080: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1000) libhdfs needs to be updated to use the new UGI

2010-06-07 Thread Devaraj Das (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HDFS-1000: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) libhdfs needs to be updated to use the new UGI

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1000) libhdfs needs to be updated to use the new UGI

2010-06-07 Thread Devaraj Das (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HDFS-1000: -- Attachment: hdfs-1000-trunk.1.patch Patch for trunk. I ran the libhdfs unit test manually and it worked

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1110) Namenode heap optimization - reuse objects for commonly used file names

2010-06-07 Thread Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HDFS-1110: -- Attachment: hdfs-1110.5.patch Removed NamespaceDedupe and added it as a processor

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1114) Reducing NameNode memory usage by an alternate hash table

2010-06-07 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HDFS-1114: - Attachment: h1114_20100607.patch Suresh, thanks for your comment. I will update

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1000) libhdfs needs to be updated to use the new UGI

2010-06-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876535#action_12876535 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1000: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1000) libhdfs needs to be updated to use the new UGI

2010-06-07 Thread Devaraj Das (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12876544#action_12876544 ] Devaraj Das commented on HDFS-1000: --- The test failures are unrelated. In fact the patch