[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9608) Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with heterogeneous storages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104855#comment-15104855 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9608: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9608) Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with heterogeneous storages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei Zhou updated HDFS-9608: --- Attachment: HDFS-9608.04.patch Sorry for the issue. Thank you for review! > Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with het

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7859) Erasure Coding: Persist erasure coding policies in NameNode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104111#comment-15104111 ] Xinwei Qin commented on HDFS-7859: --- Hi, [~drankye], I will proceed to fill this jira rec

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9646) ErasureCodingWorker may fail when recovering data blocks with length less than the first internal block

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104064#comment-15104064 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-9646: - Yeah, I saw it. I didn't check the codes when thinking a

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7859) Erasure Coding: Persist erasure coding policies in NameNode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104056#comment-15104056 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-7859: - Hello [~xinwei], According to discussions in HDFS-7337

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7859) Erasure Coding: Persist erasure coding policies in NameNode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104054#comment-15104054 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-7859: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-7859) Erasure Coding: Persist erasure coding policies in NameNode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kai Zheng updated HDFS-7859: Summary: Erasure Coding: Persist erasure coding policies in NameNode (was: Erasure Coding: Persist EC schema

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-7866) Erasure coding: NameNode manages multiple erasure coding policies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kai Zheng updated HDFS-7866: Summary: Erasure coding: NameNode manages multiple erasure coding policies (was: Erasure coding: NameNode ma

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7866) Erasure coding: NameNode manages EC schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104051#comment-15104051 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-7866: - Hi [~lirui], the patch is very large and I noticed much

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9220) Reading small file (< 512 bytes) that is open for append fails due to incorrect checksum

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15104034#comment-15104034 ] Junping Du commented on HDFS-9220: -- Thanks [~kihwal] for clarification on this. For layout

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8871) Decommissioning of a node with a failed volume may not start

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103991#comment-15103991 ] Junping Du commented on HDFS-8871: -- Move it out of 2.6.4 given no update for a while. > D

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8871) Decommissioning of a node with a failed volume may not start

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junping Du updated HDFS-8871: - Target Version/s: 2.7.3, 2.6.5 (was: 2.7.3, 2.6.4) > Decommissioning of a node with a failed volume may no

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9500) datanodesSoftwareVersions map may counting wrong when rolling upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103980#comment-15103980 ] Junping Du commented on HDFS-9500: -- bq. So the simplest way to fix this is that we always

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8870) Lease is leaked on write failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103968#comment-15103968 ] Junping Du commented on HDFS-8870: -- Hi [~daryn], is this issue related to HDFS-9294? Thank

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8578) On upgrade, Datanode should process all storage/data dirs in parallel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103714#comment-15103714 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8578: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8578) On upgrade, Datanode should process all storage/data dirs in parallel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze updated HDFS-8578: -- Attachment: h8578_20160117.patch h8578_20160117.patch: addresses the review comments from