[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: allow to use multiple EC policies in striping related tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kai Zheng updated HDFS-9658: Summary: Erasure Coding: allow to use multiple EC policies in striping related tests (was: Erasure Coding:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9646) ErasureCodingWorker may fail when recovering data blocks with length less than the first internal block

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105377#comment-15105377 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-9646: - The above logic (in the method comment) may not hold well in striping

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9659) EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105324#comment-15105324 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-9659: - By the way, suggest use {{RPC#getProxy}} instead. The {{waitForProxy}}

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9646) ErasureCodingWorker may fail when recovering data blocks with length less than the first internal block

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105368#comment-15105368 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-9646: - The change of {{reportCheckSumFailure}} obviously corrected a coding

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105366#comment-15105366 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9658: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8430) Erasure coding: compute file checksum for stripe files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105005#comment-15105005 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-8430: - Status update FileSystem: * Added new API {{getFileChecksum(String

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9038) DFS reserved space is erroneously counted towards non-DFS used.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105047#comment-15105047 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-9038: - Ping. Any update on this guys? > DFS reserved space is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9425) Expose number of blocks per volume as a metric

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105072#comment-15105072 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-9425: - patch looks good. Have some comments. 1. Need to consider

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9608) Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with heterogeneous storages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei Zhou updated HDFS-9608: --- Attachment: HDFS-9608.05.patch Fix some test failure issues. > Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with heterogeneous

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Weiwei Yang updated HDFS-9653: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through

[jira] [Work started] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HDFS-9653 started by Weiwei Yang. - > Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Liu Shaohui updated HDFS-9656: -- Attachment: HDFS-9656-v1.patch Add Hadoop-tools jars to the classpath of hadoop commands > Hadoop-tools

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9629) Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105050#comment-15105050 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-9629: [~xiaochen] thanks for working on this,IMHO,better

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

Liu Shaohui created HDFS-9656: - Summary: Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command Key: HDFS-9656 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15104987#comment-15104987 ] Liu Shaohui commented on HDFS-9656: --- [~cnauroth] [~chuanliu] Could you help to review this patch? Thanks~

[jira] [Work started] (HDFS-9152) Get input/output error while copying 800 small files to NFS Gateway mount point

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HDFS-9152 started by Weiwei Yang. - > Get input/output error while copying 800 small files to NFS Gateway mount > point >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9630) DistCp minor refactoring and clean up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105030#comment-15105030 ] Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-9630: - Thanks [~zhz] for the help update, review and commit! > DistCp minor

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Weiwei Yang updated HDFS-9653: -- Description: HDFS-5986 adds *Number of Blocks Pending Deletion* on namenode UI and JMX, propose to

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Weiwei Yang updated HDFS-9653: -- Attachment: HDFS-9653.001.patch Submitted patch, it is a pretty straight forward change, please kindly

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9657) Schedule EC tasks at proper time to reduce the impact of recovery traffic

Li Bo created HDFS-9657: --- Summary: Schedule EC tasks at proper time to reduce the impact of recovery traffic Key: HDFS-9657 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9657 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9629) Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Chen updated HDFS-9629: Attachment: HDFS-9629.02.patch > Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016 >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9645) DiskBalancer : Add Query RPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anu Engineer updated HDFS-9645: --- Attachment: HDFS-9645-HDFS-1312.002.patch bq. I have a question: we set the result as long in

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9534) Add CLI command to clear storage policy from a path.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105595#comment-15105595 ] Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534: - Thanks [~walter.k.su], do you think what semantic of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9629) Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105529#comment-15105529 ] Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-9629: - Thanks [~brahmareddy] for the input. Patch 2 hard codes 2016. > Update

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9629) Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105530#comment-15105530 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9629: - | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9608) Disk IO imbalance in HDFS with heterogeneous storages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105183#comment-15105183 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9608: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rui Li updated HDFS-9658: - Attachment: HDFS-9658.1.patch > Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1] >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9659) EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105226#comment-15105226 ] Surendra Singh Lilhore commented on HDFS-9659: -- Attached initial patch Please review.. >

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1]

Rui Li created HDFS-9658: Summary: Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1] Key: HDFS-9658 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7866) Erasure coding: NameNode manages multiple erasure coding policies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105209#comment-15105209 ] Rui Li commented on HDFS-7866: -- Thanks Kai for the suggestions. I just filed HDFS-9658 to break this task into

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9659) EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should timeout

Surendra Singh Lilhore created HDFS-9659: Summary: EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should timeout Key: HDFS-9659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9659 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rui Li updated HDFS-9658: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Erasure Coding: make tests compatible with multiple EC policies [Part 1] >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105172#comment-15105172 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9653: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9659) EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Surendra Singh Lilhore updated HDFS-9659: - Attachment: HDFS-9659.patch > EditLogTailerThread to Active Namenode RPC should

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105514#comment-15105514 ] Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-9653: --- The UT failure seems to be irrelevant to this patch. These 3 tests

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HDFS-9656: --- Target Version/s: (was: 2.7.1) > Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HDFS-9656: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) > Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9656) Hadoop-tools jars should be included in the classpath of hadoop command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105706#comment-15105706 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-9656: -1 1) Adding hadoop-tools to the default path is going to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9525) hadoop utilities need to support provided delegation tokens

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105746#comment-15105746 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-9525: I believe the issues have been dealt with. if there are

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105992#comment-15105992 ] Ruslan Dautkhanov commented on HDFS-6255: - Chris, Thank you for prompt response. Yep, we have

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9456) BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-9456: Summary: BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement (was:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9658) Erasure Coding: allow to use multiple EC policies in striping related tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106105#comment-15106105 ] Rui Li commented on HDFS-9658: -- Test failures don't seem related and cannot be reproduced locally. > Erasure

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9456) BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-9456: Summary: BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement() (was:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106052#comment-15106052 ] Ruslan Dautkhanov commented on HDFS-6255: - I jsut used Navigator to see if there are hdfs denials

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9244) Support nested encryption zones

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106091#comment-15106091 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9244: - Hi [~zhz], will this fix break the EZ trash support introduced

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105977#comment-15105977 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-6255: - [~Tagar], can you please describe in detail the problem that

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106040#comment-15106040 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-6255: - Thank you, [~Tagar]. For the {{ls}} command that failed with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=13988286#comment-13988286 ] Colin Patrick McCabe edited comment on HDFS-6255 at 1/18/16 11:23 PM: --

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9456) BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-9456: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9456) BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-9456: Attachment: HDFS-9456.001.patch Posted patch V001, kindly review. >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9244) Support nested encryption zones

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106045#comment-15106045 ] Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-9244: --- > ... Rollback won't be allowed ... Rollback must

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9094) Add command line option to ask NameNode reload configuration.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-9094: Attachment: HDFS-9094-HDFS-9000.006.patch Patch V006 fixed the issues. Thanks [~arpitagarwal]. >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106145#comment-15106145 ] Eric Yang commented on HDFS-9653: - Can you generate one more patch for branch-2? Assuming that you want

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9623) Update example configuration of block state change log in log4j.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akira AJISAKA updated HDFS-9623: Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9094) Add command line option to ask NameNode reload configuration.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106205#comment-15106205 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9094: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9623) Update example configuration of block state change log in log4j.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akira AJISAKA updated HDFS-9623: Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Update example configuration

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9623) Update example configuration of block state change log in log4j.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106243#comment-15106243 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9623: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9135 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9456) BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup should override verifyBlockPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106178#comment-15106178 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9456: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6054) MiniQJMHACluster should not use static port to avoid binding failure in unit test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106200#comment-15106200 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6054: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9623) Update example configuration of block state change log in log4j.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106225#comment-15106225 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-9623: - +1, committing this. > Update example configuration of block

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9623) Update example configuration of block state change log in log4j.properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106235#comment-15106235 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9623: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Weiwei Yang updated HDFS-9653: -- Attachment: HDFS-9653-branch-2.001.patch Submit a patch for branch-2 > Expose the number of blocks

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9629) Update the footer of Web UI to show year 2016

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106353#comment-15106353 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-9629: - I'm +1 for hard-coding the year because Xiao's concern is big. I

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9660) TestBlockScanner.testScanRateLimit fails intermittently

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yongjun Zhang updated HDFS-9660: Description: Regression org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockScanner.testScanRateLimit

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6054) MiniQJMHACluster should not use static port to avoid binding failure in unit test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106360#comment-15106360 ] Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-6054: - Filed HDFS-9660 for TestBlockScanner.testScanRateLimit failure.

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl. The dn's jstack result is !image-hdfs-9661-jstack.png|align=right,

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Assignee: Vinayakumar B (was: ade) > Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw >

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9660) TestBlockScanner.testScanRateLimit fails intermittently

Yongjun Zhang created HDFS-9660: --- Summary: TestBlockScanner.testScanRateLimit fails intermittently Key: HDFS-9660 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9660 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

ade created HDFS-9661: - Summary: Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw Key: HDFS-9661 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl. The dn's jstack result is !image-hdfs-9661-jstack.gif! was: We

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Attachment: hdfs-9661-jstack.gif.png > Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl. The dn's jstack result is !hdfs-9661-jstack.gif! was: We found

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl. The dn's jstack result is !hdfs-9661-jstack.gif.png! was: We

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw from rpc call:

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9653) Expose the number of blocks pending deletion through dfsadmin report command

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106311#comment-15106311 ] Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-9653: --- Thanks Eric. I just submitted a patch for branch-2. > Expose the

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9534) Add CLI command to clear storage policy from a path.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106366#comment-15106366 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-9534: - Currently unspecified policy means using the default policy. Thus I do

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Description: We found a deadlock in dn.FsDatasetImpl. The dn's jstack result is was: We found a deadlock in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9661) Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ade updated HDFS-9661: -- Attachment: HDFS-9661.0.patch > Deadlock in DN.FsDatasetImpl between moveBlockAcrossStorage and createRbw >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9645) DiskBalancer : Add Query RPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105783#comment-15105783 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9645: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9534) Add CLI command to clear storage policy from a path.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105854#comment-15105854 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534: - Hi Walter, Xiaobing, this approach looks fine to me. I see no

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6255) fuse_dfs will not adhere to ACL permissions in some cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105940#comment-15105940 ] Ruslan Dautkhanov commented on HDFS-6255: - Hi Chris Nauroth, > In its default configuration, fuse