[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223781#comment-15223781 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-10235: -- I'm -1 for the proposal. Absolute time is goo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223788#comment-15223788 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10235: - its only for live nodes. Not fo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223801#comment-15223801 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-10235: -- Sorry, I missed that. I'm +1 for this change.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223803#comment-15223803 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-10235: -- One comment for the patch: {code:title=dfshea

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10245) Fix the findbug warnings in branch-2.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223846#comment-15223846 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10245: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9902) dfs.datanode.du.reserved should be difference between StorageType DISK and RAM_DISK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223848#comment-15223848 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9902: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6549) Add support for accessing the NFS gateway from the AIX NFS client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223928#comment-15223928 ] Vishal commented on HDFS-6549: -- Hi Team, Could you please suggest how to install this patches

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223974#comment-15223974 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10235: - {{lastContact}} is given as se

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10245) Fix the findbug warnings in branch-2.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224037#comment-15224037 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10245: - Hi [~aw] *Seems to be, findbu

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10256) Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories

Vinayakumar B created HDFS-10256: Summary: Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories Key: HDFS-10256 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10256 Project: Hado

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10256) Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224077#comment-15224077 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-10256: -- Depends on HADOOP-12984. > Use GenericTestUt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10256) Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224092#comment-15224092 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-10256: --- GitHub user vinayakumarb opened a pull requ

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224116#comment-15224116 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10178: --- bq. Should the test logic be encapsulate in the Dat

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224205#comment-15224205 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-10178: -- Hi [~kihwal], I am trying to understand the i

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-6376) Distcp data between two HA clusters requires another configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] loushang updated HDFS-6376: --- Assignee: Michael Wall (was: Dave Marion) > Distcp data between two HA clusters requires another configuration

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9917) IBR accumulate more objects when SNN was down for sometime.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224222#comment-15224222 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-9917: {{TestRenameSnapshot}},{{TestDecom

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-6376) Distcp data between two HA clusters requires another configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Wall updated HDFS-6376: --- Assignee: Dave Marion (was: Michael Wall) > Distcp data between two HA clusters requires another confi

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224294#comment-15224294 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10178: --- [~vinayrpet], sorry, I gave a confusing description

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kihwal Lee updated HDFS-10178: -- Description: We have observed that write fails permanently if the first packet doesn't go through prope

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10245) Fix the findbug warnings in branch-2.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224316#comment-15224316 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-10245: - bq. Seems to be, findbug report shows

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10231) libhdfs++: Fix race conditions in RPC layer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Hansen updated HDFS-10231: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed with c2e1e23d8ea9a6002c1aaf

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7661) [umbrella] support hflush and hsync for erasure coded files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224630#comment-15224630 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-7661: - I agree with [~demongaorui]'s comment here. In general,

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kihwal Lee updated HDFS-10178: -- Attachment: HDFS-10178.v5.patch Five time's a charm. Moved the fault injection code. Verified it still f

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8277) Safemode enter fails when Standby NameNode is down

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224665#comment-15224665 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-8277: - Hi [~surendrasingh], I am not convinced the v1 p

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8277) Safemode enter fails when Standby NameNode is down

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224675#comment-15224675 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-8277: - Just to make it explicit, I am -1 on that approa

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224718#comment-15224718 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10178: -- +1 pending Jenkins. > Permanent write failur

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9599) TestDecommissioningStatus.testDecommissionStatus occasionally fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224729#comment-15224729 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HDFS-9599: +1 > TestDecommissioningStatus.testDecomm

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9599) TestDecommissioningStatus.testDecommissionStatus occasionally fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224757#comment-15224757 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9599: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9551 (See [https:

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9599) TestDecommissioningStatus.testDecommissionStatus occasionally fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Masatake Iwasaki updated HDFS-9599: --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Target Ve

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224876#comment-15224876 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-10235: - I too am +1 for relative time for live nodes an

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224888#comment-15224888 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HDFS-10178: - Thanks for the update, [~kihwal]. +1 to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8893) DNs with failed volumes stop serving during rolling upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224988#comment-15224988 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HDFS-8893: --- [~daryn] / [~shahrs87], any

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224987#comment-15224987 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10178: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8893) DNs with failed volumes stop serving during rolling upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rushabh S Shah updated HDFS-8893: - Target Version/s: 2.7.4 (was: 2.7.3) > DNs with failed volumes stop serving during rolling upgrade

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8871) Decommissioning of a node with a failed volume may not start

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224994#comment-15224994 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HDFS-8871: --- [~daryn] / [~kihwal], any up

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8893) DNs with failed volumes stop serving during rolling upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224993#comment-15224993 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8893: -- This is still a bug. Don't have enough cycles

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8893) DNs with failed volumes stop serving during rolling upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225002#comment-15225002 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HDFS-8893: --- Tx for the quick response, [

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10250) Ozone: Add key Persistence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225010#comment-15225010 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10250: -- Hello [~anu]. In patch v002, I still see typ

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225026#comment-15225026 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HDFS-8791: --- I commented on the JIRA way

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-6962) ACLs inheritance conflict with umaskmode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Wang updated HDFS-6962: -- Priority: Critical (was: Major) Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change Bumping the importance of this

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225062#comment-15225062 ] Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-8791: --- Do we actually support downgrade between 2.7 and 2.6

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10250) Ozone: Add key Persistence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225090#comment-15225090 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10250: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225103#comment-15225103 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10178: --- {{TestHFlush}}: HDFS-2043 Will review the patch. JD

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10216) distcp -diff relative path exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225130#comment-15225130 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-10216: -- Looks like {{getPathWithSchemeAndAuthority}} does not

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kihwal Lee updated HDFS-10178: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.7.3 Status: Resolved (w

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225148#comment-15225148 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-10178: --- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9552 (See [htt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225151#comment-15225151 ] Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-8791: Hmm. My understanding was that th

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10251) Ozone: Shutdown cleanly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anu Engineer updated HDFS-10251: Attachment: HDFS-10251-HDFS-7240.001.patch posting for early code review, depends on HDFS-10250 > O

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Trezzo updated HDFS-8791: --- Release Note: HDFS-8791 introduces a new datanode layout format. This layout is identical to the previo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225242#comment-15225242 ] Chris Trezzo commented on HDFS-8791: bq. Please expand the release note to state that s

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225244#comment-15225244 ] Chris Trezzo commented on HDFS-8791: bq. My understanding was that this patch adds a ne

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225258#comment-15225258 ] Chris Trezzo commented on HDFS-8791: [~busbey] That being said, I did manually verify t

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9732) Remove DelegationTokenIdentifier.toString() —for better logging output

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yongjun Zhang updated HDFS-9732: Attachment: HDFS-9732.003.patch > Remove DelegationTokenIdentifier.toString() —for better logging out

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9732) Remove DelegationTokenIdentifier.toString() —for better logging output

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225283#comment-15225283 ] Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-9732: - Hi [~ste...@apache.org], Thanks a lot for your

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10250) Ozone: Add key Persistence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anu Engineer updated HDFS-10250: Attachment: HDFS-10250-HDFS-7240.003.patch Hopefully this slays the typo demon > Ozone: Add key Pe

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10207) Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225304#comment-15225304 ] Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10207: -- v002 added more unit tests. > Support enable

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10207) Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-10207: - Attachment: HDFS-10207-HDFS-9000.002.patch > Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode re

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10207) Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-10207: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10207) Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiaobing Zhou updated HDFS-10207: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10207) Support enable Hadoop IPC backoff without namenode restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225347#comment-15225347 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10207: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Assigned] (HDFS-9909) Can't read file after hdfs restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Chen reassigned HDFS-9909: --- Assignee: Xiao Chen > Can't read file after hdfs restart > -- > >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9909) Can't read file after hdfs restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225381#comment-15225381 ] Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-9909: - Thanks for reporting this Bogdan. I'd like to work on th

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225393#comment-15225393 ] Lei (Eddy) Xu commented on HDFS-8496: - +1 Thanks for the nice work, [~sinago], [~cmccab

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-7717) Erasure Coding: distribute replication to EC conversion work to DataNode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jing Zhao updated HDFS-7717: Summary: Erasure Coding: distribute replication to EC conversion work to DataNode (was: Erasure Coding: dist

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10256) Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B updated HDFS-10256: - Target Version/s: 2.9.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use GenericTestUtils.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225423#comment-15225423 ] Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-8496: Thanks for the review, [~eddyxu].

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225423#comment-15225423 ] Colin Patrick McCabe edited comment on HDFS-8496 at 4/5/16 1:01 AM: -

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe updated HDFS-8496: --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Target Version/s: 2.8.0 (was: 2

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225456#comment-15225456 ] Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-8496: Committed to 2.8... thanks, all.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8496) Calling stopWriter() with FSDatasetImpl lock held may block other threads

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225458#comment-15225458 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8496: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9554 (See [https:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225482#comment-15225482 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HDFS-8791: --- bq. I didn't think that it

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10178) Permanent write failures can happen if pipeline recoveries occur for the first packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225492#comment-15225492 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-10178: -- Thanks [~kihwal] for making me clear about th

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9917) IBR accumulate more objects when SNN was down for sometime.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225500#comment-15225500 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-9917: - Committing shortly. > IBR accumulate more objec

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9917) IBR accumulate more objects when SNN was down for sometime.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinayakumar B updated HDFS-9917: Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.7.3 Status: Resolved

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225522#comment-15225522 ] Sean Busbey commented on HDFS-8791: --- Downgrade breakage only in minor versions please >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9917) IBR accumulate more objects when SNN was down for sometime.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225526#comment-15225526 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-9917: [~vinayrpet] thanks for review and

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9917) IBR accumulate more objects when SNN was down for sometime.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225529#comment-15225529 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9917: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9555 (See [https:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10250) Ozone: Add key Persistence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225544#comment-15225544 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10250: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10245) Fix the findbug warnings in branch-2.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225546#comment-15225546 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10245: - bq. There was 1 findbugs found

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brahma Reddy Battula updated HDFS-10235: Attachment: HDFS-10235-002.patch Uploaded the patch..Added the time unit(sec) for Li

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10257) Quick Thread Local Storage set-up has a small flaw

Stephen Bovy created HDFS-10257: --- Summary: Quick Thread Local Storage set-up has a small flaw Key: HDFS-10257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10257 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Ty

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9732) Remove DelegationTokenIdentifier.toString() —for better logging output

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225581#comment-15225581 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9732: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10235) [NN UI] Last contact for Live Nodes should be relative time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225603#comment-15225603 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10235: -- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vot

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10175) add per-operation stats to FileSystem.Statistics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe updated HDFS-10175: Attachment: TestStatisticsOverhead.java I wrote a test named {{TestStatisticsOverhea

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10208) Addendum for HDFS-9579: to handle the case when client machine can't resolve network path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225634#comment-15225634 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10208: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10257) Quick Thread Local Storage set-up has a small flaw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225641#comment-15225641 ] Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-10257: - Can you explain why you think t

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225649#comment-15225649 ] Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-8791: I don't think we ever discussed or

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10257) Quick Thread Local Storage set-up has a small flaw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225659#comment-15225659 ] Stephen Bovy commented on HDFS-10257: - Thanks for your quick reply :) The problem is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10257) Quick Thread Local Storage set-up has a small flaw

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225669#comment-15225669 ] Stephen Bovy commented on HDFS-10257: - When someone wants to use "HAVE_BETTER_TLS"

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9599) TestDecommissioningStatus.testDecommissionStatus occasionally fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225666#comment-15225666 ] Lin Yiqun commented on HDFS-9599: - Thanks [~iwasakims] for commit! > TestDecommissioningSt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8791) block ID-based DN storage layout can be very slow for datanode on ext4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225682#comment-15225682 ] Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-8791: --- bq. This is really unfortunate. Can you give a refer

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10256) Use GenericTestUtils.getTestDir method in tests for temporary directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225698#comment-15225698 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10256: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10258) Erasure Coding: support small cluster whose #DataNode < # (Blocks in a BlockGroup)

Li Bo created HDFS-10258: Summary: Erasure Coding: support small cluster whose #DataNode < # (Blocks in a BlockGroup) Key: HDFS-10258 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10258 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10258) Erasure Coding: support small cluster whose #DataNode < # (Blocks in a BlockGroup)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Li Bo updated HDFS-10258: - Description: Currently EC has not supported small clusters whose datanode number is smaller than the block numbers

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10234) DistCp log output should contain copied and deleted files and directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225784#comment-15225784 ] Lin Yiqun commented on HDFS-10234: -- Thanks [~k.shaposhni...@gmail.com] for concrete descr

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10234) DistCp log output should contain copied and deleted files and directories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-10234: - Attachment: HDFS-10234.002.patch > DistCp log output should contain copied and deleted files and directori