[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8898:
--
Attachment: HDFS-8898.patch
Here is the patch just to illustrate the idea. Applications have the option to
get {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9004:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9004-3.patch
Thanks [~eddyxu]! Here is the updated patch that addresses your comment. The
faile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14804935#comment-14804935
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9004:
---
Hmm, the test failure seems to indicate hadoop-hdfs unit tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903600#comment-14903600
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9004:
---
Thanks [~eddyxu], [~shahrs87] and [~ctrezzo].
> Add upgrad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903774#comment-14903774
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy] for the useful analysis! My preference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908908#comment-14908908
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]. Maybe we can move {{hasClusterEverBee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14934622#comment-14934622
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]! Here are couple comments.
* NetworkT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9015:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9015.patch
The patch refactors TestReplicationPolicy* test code in the following ways:
* Move c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9015:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Refactor TestReplicationPolicy to test different b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14940676#comment-14940676
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-7877:
---
Maybe we should try to support persistence for timeout. We c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14941576#comment-14941576
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9015:
---
Thanks [~eddyxu]!
> Refactor TestReplicationPolicy to test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14943562#comment-14943562
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9142:
---
Thanks [~l201514] for identifying the issue. Having each nam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9006:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9006.patch
Here is the draft patch that implements the upgrade domain policy.
> Provide BlockPl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9006:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Provide BlockPlacementPolicy that supports upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14949145#comment-14949145
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9142:
---
[~l201514], there are some debug statements like "System.out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9006:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9006-2.patch
Thanks [~eddyxu] for the great input! Here is the updated patch.
bq. We can make c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9006:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9006-3.patch
Failed tests aren't related. Updated the patch to address checkstyle and
whitespac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9142:
--
Summary: Update MiniDFSCluster to use separate Configuration object for
each namenode (was: Separating Configur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950917#comment-14950917
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9142:
---
+1 on the latest patch. I have committed to trunk. However i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9142:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Thanks [~l20151
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950972#comment-14950972
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9142:
---
Thanks [~liuml07] for the code review.
> Separating Configu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14954023#comment-14954023
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9006:
---
Thanks [~eddyxu] and [~ctrezzo]!
> Provide BlockPlacementPo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14954317#comment-14954317
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
[~brahmareddy], regarding the {{verifyBlockPlacement}} part,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14956200#comment-14956200
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]!
Most of the change looks good. It se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14957248#comment-14957248
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~vinayrpet]!
bq. how about waiting for commit to br
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14960050#comment-14960050
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
[~brahmareddy], can you please check again if TestBalancer a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14960823#comment-14960823
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8898:
---
Thanks [~kihwal]! I will update the patch with new unit test
Ming Ma created HDFS-9259:
-
Summary: Make SO_SNDBUF size configurable at DFSClient side for
hdfs write scenario
Key: HDFS-9259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259
Project: Hadoop HDFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9259:
--
Description:
We recently found that cross-DC hdfs write could be really slow. Further
investigation identified t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9259:
--
Assignee: Mingliang Liu
Thanks [~liuml07]! I have assigned it to you.
> Make SO_SNDBUF size configurable at DFSC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14962697#comment-14962697
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Most of the test failures are due to mismatch between BlockM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964327#comment-14964327
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]! It looks great. Sorry, there is one q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964506#comment-14964506
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8647:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]. It seems you also need to change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8647:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Abstract BlockManager's rack policy into BlockPlacementPolicy
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8647:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Abstract BlockManager's rack policy into BlockPlacementPolicy
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8647:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
+1 on the lates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9007.patch
Here is the initial patch. The basic idea is to add a new method called
{{isMovable}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Fix HDFS Balancer to honor upgrade domain policy
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14975177#comment-14975177
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9259:
---
Thanks [~liuml07]! The patch looks good. Just some format ni
Ming Ma created HDFS-9313:
-
Summary: Possible NullPointerException in BlockManager if no
excess replica can be chosen
Key: HDFS-9313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313
Project: Hadoop HDFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9313:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Possible NullPointerException in BlockManager if n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9313:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9313.patch
Here is the patch that illustrates the scenario. It is better to guard against
this.
Ming Ma created HDFS-9314:
-
Summary: Improve BlockPlacementPolicyDefault's picking of excess
replicas
Key: HDFS-9314
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9314
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue T
Ming Ma created HDFS-9315:
-
Summary: Update excess storage type list properly when del hint is
picked
Key: HDFS-9315
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9315
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9315:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9315.patch
Here is the patch that explains the scenario and the fix. Update
{{excessTypes}} reg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9315:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Update excess storage type list properly when del
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14975612#comment-14975612
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9313:
---
The question is, even after HDFS-9314 is fixed we might stil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9313:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9313-2.patch
New patch to fix the issue Mingliang pointed out. Thanks Mingliang, Water,
Brahma.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9259:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14976853#comment-14976853
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9313:
---
Thanks [~zhz]. If it continues, given no state has changed o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14977301#comment-14977301
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9083:
---
LGTM. [~shahrs87] any test failures in branch 2.7(if any, it
Ming Ma created HDFS-9360:
-
Summary: Storage type usage isn't updated properly after file
deletion
Key: HDFS-9360
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9360:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9360.patch
The issue is in {{computeQuotaUsage}}, where {{bsps.getPolicy}} returns the
default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9360:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Storage type usage isn't updated properly after fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8898:
--
Attachment: HDFS-8898-2.patch
Here is the updated patch with new unit tests. Another change in the updated
patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8898:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Create API and command-line argument to get quota
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9360:
--
Description: For a directory that doesn't have any storage policy defined,
its storage quota usage is deducted wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9007-2.patch
Thanks [~eddyxu]! With function overloading of getDatanodeInfo, the generics
funct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9360:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9360-2.patch
Thanks [~xyao]. Here is the updated patch with your suggestion.
> Storage type usa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9313:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Attachment: (was: HDFS-9007-2.patch)
> Fix HDFS Balancer to honor upgrade domain policy
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9007-2.patch
> Fix HDFS Balancer to honor upgrade domain policy
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9007:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9007-branch-2.patch
Here is the patch for branch-2.
> Fix HDFS Balancer to honor upgrade domain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14988773#comment-14988773
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9007:
---
The latest test is for the branch-2 patch. I ran the failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-8898:
--
Attachment: HDFS-8898-3.patch
Thanks [~vinayrpet]! Here is the updated patch that addresses your comments,
findb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14990185#comment-14990185
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9007:
---
Thanks [~eddyxu]!
> Fix HDFS Balancer to honor upgrade doma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14991909#comment-14991909
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9360:
---
Thanks [~xyao].
> Storage type usage isn't updated properly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14992079#comment-14992079
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8820:
---
Thanks [~arpitagarwal].
Regarding the {{RpcEngine}} backwar
Ming Ma created HDFS-9388:
-
Summary: Refactor decommission related code to support maintenance
state for datanodes
Key: HDFS-9388
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9388
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Ming Ma created HDFS-9389:
-
Summary: Add maintenance states to AdminStates
Key: HDFS-9389
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9389
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-task
Re
Ming Ma created HDFS-9390:
-
Summary: Block management for maintenance states
Key: HDFS-9390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-task
Ming Ma created HDFS-9391:
-
Summary: Update webUI/JMX/fsck to display maintenance state info
Key: HDFS-9391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9391
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-t
Ming Ma created HDFS-9392:
-
Summary: Admins support for maintenance state
Key: HDFS-9392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-task
Rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14998911#comment-14998911
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9005:
---
[~jmeagher] provided some input from admins point of view. T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003219#comment-15003219
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9239:
---
Sorry for the jumping in late for the discussion. While we h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003365#comment-15003365
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9413:
---
Thanks [~brahmareddy]. You bring up an interesting point, wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15005129#comment-15005129
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9413:
---
Nit: Maybe use {{HAUtil.setAllowStandbyReads(conf, false);}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9413:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9392.patch
Here is the draft patch. It also includes datanode state machine transition
under so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Admins support for maintenance state
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9392-2.patch
Updated patch to fix checkstyle, whitespace and unit tests.
> Admins support for m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9392-3.patch
Thanks [~eddyxu]! Here is the new patch with the checkstyle fixes.
> Admins suppor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9392-4.patch
New patch with additional checkstyle fixes.
> Admins support for maintenance state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9392:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.9.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma reopened HDFS-9392:
---
> Admins support for maintenance state
>
>
> Key: HDFS-9392
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma resolved HDFS-9392.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Admins support for maintenance state
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma reassigned HDFS-9392:
-
Assignee: Ming Ma
> Admins support for maintenance state
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9390:
--
Assignee: Ming Ma
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Block management for maintenance states
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9390:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9390.patch
[~eddyxu] sorry for the delay. Due to the big difference between trunk and 2.6
which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9390:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9390-2.patch
Updated patch to address the checkstyle and test code issues.
> Block management f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15531543#comment-15531543
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-10629:
Sorry for [~elgoiri] and [~jakace] for the late reply. Ye
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9390:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9390-3.patch
Thanks [~eddyxu] for the review! Here is the new patch.
bq. If we change it to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ming Ma updated HDFS-9390:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9390-4.patch
Updated patch to address checkstyle issues.
> Block management for maintenance sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543484#comment-15543484
]
Ming Ma edited comment on HDFS-10629 at 10/3/16 9:29 PM:
-
Thanks [
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543484#comment-15543484
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-10629:
Thanks [~jakace] for the explanation and new patch.
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543484#comment-15543484
]
Ming Ma edited comment on HDFS-10629 at 10/3/16 9:31 PM:
-
Thanks [
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543484#comment-15543484
]
Ming Ma edited comment on HDFS-10629 at 10/3/16 9:33 PM:
-
Thanks [
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15563120#comment-15563120
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-10967:
Thanks [~zhz]. Indeed that is an issue when the cluster h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15563120#comment-15563120
]
Ming Ma edited comment on HDFS-10967 at 10/10/16 8:56 PM:
--
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15565729#comment-15565729
]
Ming Ma commented on HDFS-10967:
Thanks [~zhz] for the summary!
* Good idea to merge Avai
201 - 300 of 774 matches
Mail list logo
