[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-16751:
-
Summary: WebUI FileSystem explorer could delete wrong file by mistake
(was: WebUI FileSystem explorer fi
Walter Su created HDFS-16751:
Summary: WebUI FileSystem explorer file Deletion could delete
wrong file by mistake
Key: HDFS-16751
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16751
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Walter Su created HDFS-16644:
Summary: java.io.IOException Invalid token in
javax.security.sasl.qop
Key: HDFS-16644
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16644
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15284143#comment-15284143
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10383:
--
bq. IOUtils#cleanup swallows it in the finally block.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15275875#comment-15275875
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
The last patch looks pretty good. +1 once the test ni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15261938#comment-15261938
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10340:
--
I don't think it's an issue. SIGTERM comes from the o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15261388#comment-15261388
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9958:
-
bq. I think only DFSClient currently reports storageID.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15259918#comment-15259918
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9958:
-
Failed tests are not related. Will commit shortly if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15259490#comment-15259490
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-5280:
-
There's other IOExceptions will cause readBlock RPC call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15259457#comment-15259457
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9958:
-
{code}
@@ -1320,11 +1320,22 @@ public void findAndMarkBl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15259384#comment-15259384
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
bq. I think it add some readability and also because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15257898#comment-15257898
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
Thanks [~ashangit] for the update.
repeat one of my p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15255787#comment-15255787
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
bq. BR ids are monotonically increasing.
The id value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15255772#comment-15255772
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
Thank you for your explanation. I learned a lot.
> B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253523#comment-15253523
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
I mean, saving administrators the trouble to tune thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253354#comment-15253354
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
You are right. The only question I have is I have no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253236#comment-15253236
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
I like your idea of counting storages with same repor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253204#comment-15253204
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
The handler threads will wait anyway, either waiting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253181#comment-15253181
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
bq. Enabling HDFS-9198 will fifo process BRs. It does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10301:
-
Assignee: (was: Walter Su)
> Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15251150#comment-15251150
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10220:
--
1. isMaxFilesCheckedToReleaseLease is not requirted t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15249649#comment-15249649
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-5280:
-
+1 for catching the exception. The same exception will c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15249312#comment-15249312
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9958:
-
bq. we fix countNodes().corruptReplicas() to return the
Walter Su created HDFS-10316:
Summary: revisit corrupt replicas count
Key: HDFS-10316
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10316
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Report
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9744:
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247547#comment-15247547
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9744:
-
+1. will commit shortly.
> TestDirectoryScanner#testThr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10284:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.9.0
Status: Resolved (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247468#comment-15247468
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10284:
--
+1. will commit shortly.
> o.a.h.hdfs.server.blockma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247445#comment-15247445
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10291:
--
cherry-picked to trunk.
> TestShortCircuitLocalRead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247432#comment-15247432
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9958:
-
Thanks [~kshukla] for the update. I've noticed
{{testAr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10301:
-
Assignee: Walter Su
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Upload a patch. Kindly review.
> Blocks re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10301:
-
Attachment: HDFS-10301.01.patch
> Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247129#comment-15247129
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
Oh, I see. In this case, the reports are not splitted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247037#comment-15247037
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9684:
-
My previous comment is incorrect. It turns out that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15246996#comment-15246996
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10301:
--
1. IPC reader is single-thread by default. If it's mu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10275:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.7.3
Status: Resolved (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245569#comment-15245569
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10275:
--
sorry I didn't see that. The patch LGTM. +1.
> TestD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245394#comment-15245394
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10275:
--
Good analysis! I think a better way to do this is to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245332#comment-15245332
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10284:
--
bq. I think it's due to mocking fsn while being concu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245154#comment-15245154
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10291:
--
+1.
> TestShortCircuitLocalRead failing
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9412:
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Resolved (was: P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15240996#comment-15240996
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9412:
-
{{TestBalancer}} passes locally. +1 for the last patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15240455#comment-15240455
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9412:
-
Thank you for updating. The test {{TestGetBlocks}} faile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15239103#comment-15239103
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9412:
-
One thread holding a readLock too long is very like hold
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9772:
Labels: test (was: )
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Issue Type: Test (was: Bug)
> TestBlockRep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9772:
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.7.3
Status: Resolved (was: P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9772:
Summary: TestBlockReplacement#testThrottler doesn't work as expected (was:
TestBlockReplacement#testThrottle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238984#comment-15238984
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9772:
-
+1.
> TestBlockReplacement#testThrottler use falut vari
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238891#comment-15238891
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9825:
-
The patch looks pretty good. Could you rebase it? And on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238658#comment-15238658
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9476:
-
+1.
> TestDFSUpgradeFromImage#testUpgradeFromRel1BBWIma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238589#comment-15238589
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9826:
-
Good thought. And I think current implementation {{LowRe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233561#comment-15233561
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
+1. Thanks, [~rakesh_r].
> Erasure Coding: Sort located
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15232103#comment-15232103
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7661:
-
Great design/discussion. Since we come back to discuss t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15231512#comment-15231512
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
The patch looks pretty good. Thanks [~rakesh_r]. tiny su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15219241#comment-15219241
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
The optimization works for {{BlockInfoStriped}}. A missi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217456#comment-15217456
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
I see the difference. To achieve your goal, we need a ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217217#comment-15217217
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
bq. 1. Index in the logical block group. 2.Decomm status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15215796#comment-15215796
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9918:
-
We also need to sort locations by distance. It's unlikel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10182:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.6.5
committed to branch-2.6
> Hedged read might overwrite user's buf
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-10182:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.7.3
Status: Resolved (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15213926#comment-15213926
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10182:
--
+1. I'll commit it shortly.
> Hedged read might over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15213915#comment-15213915
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9952:
-
Thanks [~vinayrpet] for updating. Just one minor suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15201350#comment-15201350
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-10182:
--
And because {{cancelAll(futures);}} doesn't interrupt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15198770#comment-15198770
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9952:
-
bq. MutableRate#add is synchronized in an extremely crit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15194914#comment-15194914
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9684:
-
I have seen a case DN got command from NN to transfer hu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-8211:
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
Changes Priority to Major.
As [~qwertymaniac] pointed out, this patch unintenti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186974#comment-15186974
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9822:
-
bq. I am still a little confused how this error happens.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184856#comment-15184856
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7866:
-
Sorry for the confusion, now the javadoc looks verbose.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184267#comment-15184267
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7866:
-
1. Not only javadoc, what I mean was separating the logi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15183118#comment-15183118
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7866:
-
What do you think let it diverge instead of forcing unif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15155386#comment-15155386
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9803:
-
Is it related to HDFS-5637? Which version of hdfs-client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9716:
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
HDFS-9755 covers the same fix.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15151796#comment-15151796
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9816:
-
bq. Then we can move the current hard coded suite to Tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15150432#comment-15150432
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9816:
-
The safe length may change if steps 3,4 is included(See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15138306#comment-15138306
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9752:
-
Thanks all for reviewing the patch.
The patch depends on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9752:
Attachment: HDFS-9752-branch-2.7.03.patch
HDFS-9752-branch-2.6.03.patch
> Permanent write fai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15138264#comment-15138264
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9347:
-
Thanks [~jojochuang] for the work. I just cherry-picked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9347:
Fix Version/s: 2.6.5
2.7.3
> Invariant assumption in TestQuorumJournalManager.shutdown() i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9752:
Attachment: HDFS-9752.03.patch
bq. The test can just verify that pipelineRecoveryCount is not incremented
af
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15134131#comment-15134131
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9752:
-
Hi, [~xiaobingo]. I think the 'write failure' means the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9752:
Attachment: HDFS-9752.02.patch
Thanks for the advises. Uploaded 02 patch. The test now takes ~30s. But it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9752:
Assignee: Walter Su
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Permanent write failures may happen to slow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9752:
Attachment: HDFS-9752.01.patch
Thanks [~kihwal] for reporting this.
Uploaded 01 patch, kindly review. The pat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9748:
Affects Version/s: 2.8.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> When addExpectedReplicasToPend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9748:
Attachment: HDFS-9748.01.patch
> When addExpectedReplicasToPending is called twice, pendingReplications shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9748:
Description:
1. When completeFile() is called, addExpectedReplicasToPending() will be called
(HDFS-8999).
2
Walter Su created HDFS-9748:
---
Summary: When addExpectedReplicasToPending is called twice,
pendingReplications should avoid duplication
Key: HDFS-9748
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9748
Pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9716:
Attachment: HDFS-9716.02.patch
Thanks [~drankye]. Uploaded 02 patch to address that.
> o.a.h.hdfs.TestRecove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128008#comment-15128008
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9716:
-
You can easily reproduce the failure by delay line 345 w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128003#comment-15128003
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9716:
-
{{MiniDFSCluster.getBlockFile}} on _dead DN_ is called b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9716:
Labels: test (was: )
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.8.0)
Status: Patch Availabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su updated HDFS-9716:
Attachment: HDFS-9716.01.patch
> o.a.h.hdfs.TestRecoverStripedFile fails intermittently in trunk
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15127932#comment-15127932
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9716:
-
There are 2 ways to make BlockGroup under-replicated: 1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Walter Su reassigned HDFS-9716:
---
Assignee: Walter Su
> o.a.h.hdfs.TestRecoverStripedFile fails intermittently in trunk
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15101365#comment-15101365
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks [~xiaobingo].
1. I think the original design does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15098152#comment-15098152
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9646:
-
{code}
+ bufferSize, (int)(maxTargetLength
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15085202#comment-15085202
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7661:
-
You totally miss my point.
A successful flush is a guara
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15084527#comment-15084527
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7661:
-
According to the description,
1. 3 parity blocks should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15082272#comment-15082272
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-7661:
-
bq. But, the older parity internal block comes back late
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15082228#comment-15082228
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-8430:
-
Thanks [~szetszwo] for clarifying. {{New Algorithm 2}} l
1 - 100 of 1148 matches
Mail list logo