[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819361#comment-16819361
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Failures doesn't reproduce for me. Will commit now.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819240#comment-16819240
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16818962#comment-16818962
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Set Jira state to patch available to kick off precommit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16817908#comment-16817908
]
star commented on HDFS-10477:
-
[~jojochuang], [^HDFS-10477.branch-2.8.patch] is for branch 2.8.
Anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815013#comment-16815013
]
star commented on HDFS-10477:
-
[~jojochuang], uploaded patch for branch-2.8.
> Stop decommission a rack of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814887#comment-16814887
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Pushed up to branch-2 and branch-2.9.
> Stop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814669#comment-16814669
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Failed tests not reproducible. I will commit the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809801#comment-16809801
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Findbugs warning unrelated, caused by a previous commit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809343#comment-16809343
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809235#comment-16809235
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Here's the branch-2 patch. It partially includes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16809153#comment-16809153
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Pushed to trunk, branch-3.2, branch-3.1 and branch-3.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808982#comment-16808982
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Committing 007 soon.
[~arpitagarwal] I think that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807311#comment-16807311
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-10477:
Let's target this for 2.10 at the minimum.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807289#comment-16807289
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10477:
--
Just a thought - it may be okay to skip this function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807280#comment-16807280
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10477:
--
+1 the patch lgtm. Thanks for fixing this [~jojochuang].
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807219#comment-16807219
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
Test failures do not reproduce locally.
> Stop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807109#comment-16807109
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16803998#comment-16803998
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16803914#comment-16803914
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
The conflicts come from HDFS-13027 and HDFS-9390, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16803199#comment-16803199
]
yunjiong zhao commented on HDFS-10477:
--
[~jojochuang], I don't mind, please go ahead.
Thank you.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16803169#comment-16803169
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10477:
I took some time to review the patch.
bq. I don't recall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16293196#comment-16293196
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16104213#comment-16104213
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15423486#comment-15423486
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10477:
--
Hi [~zhaoyunjiong], [~benoyantony],
I've been thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15404918#comment-15404918
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
Didn't see Arpit's previous comments. If the recommended
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15404912#comment-15404912
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
The patch looks good.
There is no need to sleep as the admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15378343#comment-15378343
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376238#comment-15376238
]
Rakesh R commented on HDFS-10477:
-
It looks like test case is failing due to lock release, please check.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376069#comment-15376069
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15373817#comment-15373817
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10477:
--
I second [~kihwal]'s concern about releasing and reacquiring.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15366966#comment-15366966
]
yunjiong zhao commented on HDFS-10477:
--
Those failed unit test is not related to this patch.
And
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15365103#comment-15365103
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364983#comment-15364983
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364955#comment-15364955
]
Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-10477:
-
FYI..I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364835#comment-15364835
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
Thanks for the info, Akira.
> Stop decommission a rack of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364831#comment-15364831
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HDFS-10477:
--
Hi [~benoyantony], everyone who has apache id can manually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364813#comment-15364813
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HDFS-10477:
--
Triggered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15364805#comment-15364805
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
Looks good. Could you please re-trigger the build to make sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325330#comment-15325330
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325033#comment-15325033
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
[~kihwal], Your comments regarding starvation makes sense.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15314451#comment-15314451
]
yunjiong zhao commented on HDFS-10477:
--
[~kihwal],
What's your opinion on the second patch? Any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15314253#comment-15314253
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10477:
---
If the lock is simply released and re-acquired right away per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15313282#comment-15313282
]
Benoy Antony commented on HDFS-10477:
-
If its possible to release lock per storage, then that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15312946#comment-15312946
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15312438#comment-15312438
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-10477:
---
It will be better if the locking is done per storage instead of per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15311545#comment-15311545
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10477:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
46 matches
Mail list logo