[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13023530#comment-13023530
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1861:
maybe do it in a backward-compatible way f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13023571#comment-13023571
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1861:
---
Isn't the attached patch backwards-compatible? It ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13023611#comment-13023611
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1861:
apologies, patch looks good. +1
> Rename
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13024684#comment-13024684
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1861:
---
I don't think "receiver.threads" is correct - these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13024855#comment-13024855
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1861:
---
How about "dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads"? The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13024879#comment-13024879
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1861:
---
how about "dfs.datanode.max.xfer.threds?"
Just kidd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13025027#comment-13025027
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1861:
-
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest
