[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3386) BK JM : Namenode is not deleting his lock entry '/ledgers/lock/lock-0000X', when fails to acquire the lock

2012-05-23 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281786#comment-13281786 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3386: --- Yes, HDFS-3452 will take care of it.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3386) BK JM : Namenode is not deleting his lock entry '/ledgers/lock/lock-0000X', when fails to acquire the lock

2012-05-22 Thread Ivan Kelly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280964#comment-13280964 ] Ivan Kelly commented on HDFS-3386: -- HDFS-3452 will make this unnecessary.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3386) BK JM : Namenode is not deleting his lock entry '/ledgers/lock/lock-0000X', when fails to acquire the lock

2012-05-10 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13272417#comment-13272417 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-3386: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3386) BK JM : Namenode is not deleting his lock entry '/ledgers/lock/lock-0000X', when fails to acquire the lock

2012-05-08 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270502#comment-13270502 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3386: --- Yes, I think, we can delete that new