[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13665732#comment-13665732 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4832: - {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1311#comment-1311 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-4832: --- Ravi. It is OK to maintain replicati

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667170#comment-13667170 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-4832: Thanks for the review Konstantin. Yes. I agree. Th

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13668318#comment-13668318 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- Here are some comments: * The condition for figuring n

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13668973#comment-13668973 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4832: - {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13669763#comment-13669763 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4832: - {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13670470#comment-13670470 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- If I am reading the existing code correctly, if a node

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13672659#comment-13672659 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-4832: bq. The computeReplicationWorkForBlocks() is calle

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13673388#comment-13673388 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-4832: Hi Kihwal, that change was made in https://issues

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677537#comment-13677537 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- +1 to the approach. This patch stops generation of new

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677583#comment-13677583 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- bq. Please let me know if its worthwhile to take that

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677842#comment-13677842 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-4832: Oops! I mean the patch ported to branch-0.23

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13678334#comment-13678334 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- Your precommit build is running right now. https://bu

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13678335#comment-13678335 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4832: - {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13678369#comment-13678369 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-4832: -- +1 the patch looks good. > Namenode d

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-4832) Namenode doesn't change the number of missing blocks in safemode when DNs rejoin or leave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13678412#comment-13678412 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-4832: -- Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3881 (See [https://builds.