[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14627934#comment-14627934 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8670: -- Thanks [~mingma] . I have updated the patch as per yo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14628333#comment-14628333 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8670: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14629123#comment-14629123 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8670: -- Testcase failures are not related to this patch. > Be

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14629217#comment-14629217 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8670: --- Thanks [~andreina]. Overall it looks good. The two test cas

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634529#comment-14634529 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8670: -- Thanks [~mingma] . Have updated the patch as per your

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634842#comment-14634842 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8670: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634924#comment-14634924 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-8670: - Patch looks overall good. have some nits in tes

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645686#comment-14645686 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8670: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645757#comment-14645757 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-8670: - +1 for the latest patch > Better to exclude dec

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645774#comment-14645774 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #8238 (See [https:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645928#comment-14645928 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk-Java8 #271 (See [htt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645942#comment-14645942 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #1001 (See [https://

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646094#comment-14646094 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2198 (See [https://

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646135#comment-14646135 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #260 (See [htt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646258#comment-14646258 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8 #268 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646288#comment-14646288 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-8670: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2217 (See [htt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602486#comment-14602486 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8670: -- I would like to work on this issue. [~mingma], please

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602885#comment-14602885 ] Gabor Liptak commented on HDFS-8670: I also made a patch before seeing [~andreina]'s me

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14603500#comment-14603500 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8670: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14604138#comment-14604138 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8670: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14619713#comment-14619713 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8670: --- Thanks [~andreina] for the patch! * Maybe we should exclude

Auto-Re: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

您的邮件已收到！谢谢！

Auto-Re: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

您的邮件已收到！谢谢！

Auto-Re: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

您的邮件已收到！谢谢！

Auto-Re: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8670) Better to exclude decommissioned nodes for namenode NodeUsage JMX

您的邮件已收到！谢谢！