[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15057036#comment-15057036 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9535: -- ABORTED: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #692 (See [htt

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15056523#comment-15056523 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9535: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #8962 (See [https:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15056476#comment-15056476 ] Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9535: - Thanks to [~jingzhao] for cutting this jira, rev

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15056469#comment-15056469 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-9535: - The fix looks good to me. The test failures should be un

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15054079#comment-15054079 ] Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9535: - Failing tests can not be re-produced locally. Se

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15054026#comment-15054026 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9535: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15054023#comment-15054023 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9535: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15053972#comment-15053972 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9535: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15053940#comment-15053940 ] Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9535: - Thank you both for the comment. The v2 patch is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15053897#comment-15053897 ] Masatake Iwasaki commented on HDFS-9535: bq. The guarantee Jing Zhao proposed in ad

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9535) Newly completed blocks in IBR should not be considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15053893#comment-15053893 ] Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-9535: - Thanks for the patch, Mingliang! One comment is that for