[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1667) Consider redesign of block report processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003113#comment-13003113 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1667: Hi Matt, how about if we then do #2 first,

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1667) Consider redesign of block report processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003105#comment-13003105 ] Matt Foley commented on HDFS-1667: -- Hi Dhruba, for current scale, yes it would help a lot.

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1667) Consider redesign of block report processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003083#comment-13003083 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1667: Hi Matt, if the namenode can do most of th

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1667) Consider redesign of block report processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000437#comment-13000437 ] Matt Foley commented on HDFS-1667: -- Hi Brian, I agree that's a real risk. The hybrid solu

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1667) Consider redesign of block report processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000262#comment-13000262 ] Brian Bockelman commented on HDFS-1667: --- Hi Matt, Just a small comment about (1). I