t; To: Lars Francke
> Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BlockPlacementPolicy question with hierarchical topology
>
> Oh, you are right. It doesn't meet your needs. Sorry for the confusion.
> Seems it may be difficult to achive it with the existing policies.
>
> -
rsday, July 4, 2019 8:29:23 PM
To: Lars Francke
Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: BlockPlacementPolicy question with hierarchical topology
Oh, you are right. It doesn't meet your needs. Sorry for the confusion.
Seems it may be difficult to achive it with the existing policies.
e.org
Subject: Re: BlockPlacementPolicy question with hierarchical topology
Hi Takanobu,
thanks for the quick reply. I missed that class.
But does it really do what I need?
If I have these racks:
/dc1/rack1
/dc1/rack2
/dc1/rack3
/dc2/rack1
/dc2/rack2
/dc2/rack3
And I place a single block in
RackFaultTolerant.java
>
> Thanks,
> - Takanobu
>
> From: Lars Francke
> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 18:15
> To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: BlockPlacementPolicy question with hierarchical topology
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a customer who wants to m
Subject: BlockPlacementPolicy question with hierarchical topology
Hi,
I have a customer who wants to make sure that copies of his data are
distributed amongst datacenters. So they are using rack names like this
/dc1/rack1, /dc1/rack2, /dc2/rack1 etc.
Unfortunately, the BlockPlacementPolicyDefault
Hi,
I have a customer who wants to make sure that copies of his data are
distributed amongst datacenters. So they are using rack names like this
/dc1/rack1, /dc1/rack2, /dc2/rack1 etc.
Unfortunately, the BlockPlacementPolicyDefault seems to place all blocks on
/dc1/* sometimes.
Is there a way to
