on [t...@cloudera.com<mailto:t...@cloudera.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:50 AM
To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Several Inconsistencies between fsck and NN UI reports
Hi Amith,
Did you try fsck with the "-openforwrite" fla
s and Regards
> Amith
> --
> *From:* Todd Lipcon [t...@cloudera.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:50 AM
> *To:* hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Several Inconsistencies between fsck and NN UI reports
>
> Hi Amith,
>
> D
April 24, 2012 2:50 AM
To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Several Inconsistencies between fsck and NN UI reports
Hi Amith,
Did you try fsck with the "-openforwrite" flag?
-Todd
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Amith D K
mailto:amit...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
In
Hi Amith,
Did you try fsck with the "-openforwrite" flag?
-Todd
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Amith D K wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In one of our test cluster we have seen several Inconsistencies in
> between NN UI and FSCK report.
>
> 1. The number of under replicated blocks in UI and FSCK a
From: Amith D K [mailto:amit...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:19 PM
To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Several Inconsistencies between fsck and NN UI reports
Hi All,
In one of our test cluster we have seen several Inconsistencies in between NN
UI and FSCK report.
1. The numb
Hi All,
In one of our test cluster we have seen several Inconsistencies in between NN
UI and FSCK report.
1. The number of under replicated blocks in UI and FSCK are not matching
2. The NN UI is reporting missing blocks and on clicking the link there are no
missing blocks displayed, but FSCK
